BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - IV.53 > Rating is Useless?

Rating is Useless?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: huzi
This Post:
00
258899.1
Date: 5/14/2014 8:23:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
I realize that after every game, each player will get a rating score. But it seems that score has little to do with the performance of the player on that game, but really correlated to their skill sets. I once have rookie players who happen to play very well but still get a low score, while some others only played 10 minutes with a couple of boards a no points due to foul trouble but still get a very high score.

From: Peluin

To: huzi
This Post:
11
258899.2 in reply to 258899.1
Date: 5/15/2014 4:51:17 PM
Visionaries
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
You seem to have a good understanding of how it works. I wouldn't necessarily call it useless since it can help you compare where you might have a good matchup against a certain opponent, ie. your SG usually gets a 10.0 rating and his an 8.0.

I suppose there's also salary and DMI that can help predict that, but those are based on the player's best position and most teams have at least one guy playing "out of position", say a listed PG playing at SF. On the other hand if rating were based more closely on game performance, I would call that pretty useless because you can already see all the other stats the player got and make up a rating number based on that however you like

From: huzi

This Post:
00
258899.3 in reply to 258899.2
Date: 5/17/2014 11:22:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Thanks for the info! Learned a lot :)