BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - II.4 > Season 25

Season 25

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
22
247576.86 in reply to 247576.85
Date: 10/11/2013 2:48:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
Bring it on ;). Im sure Ill get the competitive spirit at the end of the season to go on a run.


If past history (as opposed to, what, future history, Hari Seldon?) is any indication, you'll get that urge around the end of interconference, retool and pick up a couple of massive animatronic donkeys and a case of cheese whiz, spend a couple of weeks reveling in the wake of peanut-oil soaked carcasses you leave in your wake, and then decide that you really have been meaning to try to figure out how to build a successful Inside Isolation/Outside Box and One team, and sell off everyone who you think doesn't fit that concept, and then realize that the guys you have left also can't run it, and decide to bank a little cash before the next NT/U21 election.

Though, to be fair, you might prefer Velveeta.

Last edited by GM-hrudey at 10/11/2013 2:48:54 PM

From: calfson

This Post:
11
247576.87 in reply to 247576.83
Date: 10/11/2013 4:12:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
Translation, even though Small Fries only started five players and let me cream them I've still not forgotten how they beat me last year, and I don't think that the Kelt's or RiverDogs are going to rest all of their starters when they play me.

This Post:
00
247576.88 in reply to 247576.86
Date: 10/11/2013 4:28:54 PM
Smallfries
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Second Team:
Smallfries II
You've got that pretty dang accurate, except for the part of my guys that are left not being able to play in the system I want. All but one is set for my system so I don't have much more to build upon other than a few more players for depth ;). Pretty accurate though.

PS-I have no desire to run for U21 so that won't be happening.

This Post:
00
247576.89 in reply to 247576.88
Date: 10/11/2013 4:34:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
You've got that pretty dang accurate, except for the part of my guys that are left not being able to play in the system I want. All but one is set for my system so I don't have much more to build upon other than a few more players for depth ;). Pretty accurate though.

PS-I have no desire to run for U21 so that won't be happening.


Oh, I'm allowed to take some liberties in the interest of entertainment. I mean, we all know you don't fry with peanut oil, and you're a tartar sauce man rather than Cheez Whiz.

From: calfson
This Post:
00
247576.90 in reply to 247576.87
Date: 10/11/2013 8:03:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
Did anybody draw a challenging or at least competitive cup match this week?

This Post:
00
247576.91 in reply to 247576.90
Date: 10/12/2013 1:40:17 PM
Arizona Cacti
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
276276
I'm playing a pretty solid IV team. I should win but I'll need to use close to my best lineup.

This Post:
00
247576.92 in reply to 247576.91
Date: 10/12/2013 2:09:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I'm playing a pretty solid IV team. I should win but I'll need to use close to my best lineup.


Playing a pretty good III team on the road, so it looks like I'll be juggling my lineups this week a little.

This Post:
00
247576.93 in reply to 247576.82
Date: 10/12/2013 2:55:10 PM
Delta 9
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
6464
Second Team:
Euphoria Seekers
On Alvarez's injury: is frustrating, but it seems realistic to me. He's an older player, so I can see why he'd spend more time on the sidelines and in the trainer's room.

I could've done without the skill drop that accompanied the injury, but that's realistic too. All this makes the game especially challenging and intriguing, IMO. I have no desire to sell off my roster or give up. It would be kind of fun to start all over though ...

From: calfson

This Post:
00
247576.94 in reply to 247576.93
Date: 10/12/2013 5:59:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
I think that the skill drop being associated with the injury is giving the game design a little to much credit, but it is sort of nice to think it is that well thought out. I personally don't have any problem with you breaking down the team and starting over - I'm going to be stuck doing that in the next season or two as well do to an aging roster.

This Post:
00
247576.95 in reply to 247576.93
Date: 10/12/2013 10:23:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
That game reminded me a lot of one I played against Burger Chefs when I first promoted to III, that ended 57-43. One of those games where neither team was giving an inch, but one was clearly better. And I guess BB's reward for me for not rolling over was a late run of meaningless points to turn what was essentially a 25+ point loss into 12 in the PD column. I'll take it.

This Post:
00
247576.96 in reply to 247576.95
Date: 10/13/2013 8:46:48 AM
Delta 9
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
6464
Second Team:
Euphoria Seekers
It was an interesting game. Since I knew you had a tough schedule, I figured I could loosen up just a touch. I played all my best OD players, mostly to the detriment of rebounding. It did bother me a great deal to give up all those offensive rebounds and you slowed down my offense a little too effectively for my taste.
I was impressed with your team. If Dennison had played more or if you'd put in effort, you might have won. I certainly have no illusions about easily beating you at your place or in the playoffs.
Good game - even though I was up by 20+ for much of the game, it still felt competitive.

Advertisement