BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - NBBA > Season 20 Smack

Season 20 Smack

Set priority
Show messages by
From: shikago

This Post:
00
216564.522 in reply to 216564.517
Date: 8/5/2012 10:50:47 PM
Milwaukee Lethargy
IV.1
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
(oh & to the other post)


just saying that after that ridiculous end to S19...
you're the *last* team that should ever complain about the end of a season! (or anyone on your behalf).


& no, i wasn't even complaining about what happened last season in that post. only recapping it in case you forgot all that went on. my thing is... if the far more "unfair" ending of last season is accepted as fine... then the ending of this season has to be fine as well. (more than fine, really).






Last edited by shikago at 8/5/2012 10:52:30 PM

From: Calum

This Post:
00
216564.523 in reply to 216564.521
Date: 8/6/2012 12:22:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
hey bud,

no I wasn't at all implying that you were wrong to give it everything, i'm pretty sure everyone would do the same thing. I was just wondering why Pel would not even play a full team. Not in a negative way, just because i'm interested. Brian's answer makes total sense btw.

The reason i went full team in our game was that you told me you'd likely tank, but weren't totally sure, and therefore I could not risk it. :)

Last edited by Calum at 8/6/2012 12:41:36 AM

From: shikago

This Post:
00
216564.524 in reply to 216564.523
Date: 8/6/2012 12:54:00 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
IV.1
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
gotcha

From: shikago

To: Coco
This Post:
00
216564.526 in reply to 216564.525
Date: 8/6/2012 6:35:09 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
IV.1
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
again, as i said above, i'm not even complaining about how S19 ended...

the point was... if he was good with the *ending* to last season, he has to be good with the *ending* to this season. How specifically is that ridiculous? He talked about getting "really screwed" by the end of the season & I pointed out his incredible end of season fortunes a mere season ago. Like, i'd get a different team feeling they got a raw deal. not in this case. that's all.

From: shikago

To: Coco
This Post:
00
216564.527 in reply to 216564.525
Date: 8/6/2012 6:39:01 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
IV.1
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
(ii) this season FTF 's running up the score helped him since his position is 100% due to PD .

not that it matters, but you're wrong. he had it locked up before he played me. but it's fine. (he even said himself just now that it was about being sure he didn't lose... )

anyway, i'm fine with whatever you did. i'm sure you had your reasons. no need to justify it.

It sucks, but in this game you play the hand you're dealt. As the case of last season shows (me having to tank both games) these kinds of things usually even out lon term.

no one's arguing against that. (at least i'm not). this whole thing was about the *end* of seasons only. i even underlined "final full week". you're bringing up week 3 when you were still in the cup for some reason?

From: shikago

To: Coco
This Post:
00
216564.530 in reply to 216564.528
Date: 8/6/2012 7:54:56 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
IV.1
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
God, I'm so tired of your antics. Let me break it down for you one last time:

Wozz makes a three line post about hard-to-explain behavior by Peluin who damaged both his own team and wozz's (about this, wozz drops a passing four word comment).
You latch on those four words and reply with an edgy treatise (and a couple extra posts) about why various people's unexplainable behavior have screwed you.

Except, those people were largely *acting in their own interest*, so, not only your tone is completely out of place, but the situations are completely different.

:)
i'm the 1st to give this a ball
i like your passion on it

From: shikago

To: Coco
This Post:
11
216564.531 in reply to 216564.529
Date: 8/6/2012 8:42:46 AM
Milwaukee Lethargy
IV.1
Overall Posts Rated:
849849
no one's arguing against that. (at least i'm not). this whole thing was about the *end* of seasons only. i even underlined "final full week". you're bringing up week 3 when you were still in the cup for some reason?


and your restriction to the "final full week" is because ... ? You distribute "right to complain" only based on the "final full week"?

because it was about the end of the season? he wasn't like "the early season really screwed me". "or the entire season screwed me". that would kind of change everything.

dude, you're missing the intention in any case.
btw, where did i say yesterday/today that someone wasn't "acting in their own interest"?
(ok using the word unexplainable, since you use it:)
it was portrayed as how from afar it could seem semi-unexplainable (even though, yes there are explanations) in the same way this last game he viewed as unexplainable. (even though there's also an explanation). all to make the comparison. i still don't see how he can complain about a blowout now, coming off those back to back 96 point blowouts at the end of last season. [if "unexpected" blowouts are good then it's good now. or it's bad both seasons. which is it?]


it seems you're reacting to tone. (maybe i'm tone deaf on all this?). if the tone is bad, i apologize. Now instead can you react specifically to things i wrote? & how is a recap of the end of S19 an edgy treatise? thanks.

or this whole thing can just be dropped.

Advertisement