BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - NBBA > Who's who in the NBBA

Who's who in the NBBA

Set priority
Show messages by
From: dhoff
This Post:
00
94230.5 in reply to 94230.4
Date: 6/3/2009 12:17:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919

King Drive Ballers (22817), GM-brianjames

17-5, 2nd place (Big 8, NBBA, USA)
(Differential +312, Pythagorean record: 18.8-3.2)
Roster: 12 players, Age 25.9, Salary 357.3K (29.8K/player)

Game strategy (40 competitive matches):
* Offense: Base Offense 15, Low Post 13, Motion 7, Patient 3, Look Inside 2
* Defense: 2-3 Zone 17, Man to Man 11, 1-3-1 Zone 9, 3-2 Zone 3
* Enthusiasm: 8 less (0 TIE vs CT), 28 equal, 4 more (0 CT vs TIE)

Overall stats (max bbstat: 142 (10348547) vs KatsaS And 1):
* KDB: 41.9 FG%, 24.8 3P%, 57.0 REB (14.8 O), 16.8 A, 5.0 ST, 6.7 TO, 14.5 PF
* Opp: 35.0 FG%, 21.4 3P%, 50.0 REB (13.8 O), 14.2 A, 3.5 ST, 8.6 TO, 15.9 PF


Pinny Paralyzers (22870), Pitbull16

19-3, 1st place (Big 8, II.3, USA)
(Differential +498, Pythagorean record: 19.9-2.1)
Roster: 13 players, Age 23.1, Salary 174.5K (13.4K/player)

Game strategy (31 competitive matches):
* Offense: Run and Gun 27, Motion 2, Push the Ball 1, Base Offense 1
* Defense: Full Court Press 29, 2-3 Zone 2
* Enthusiasm: 14 less (1 TIE vs CT), 13 equal, 4 more (0 CT vs TIE)

Overall stats (max bbstat: 107 (12857403) vs South Central Syndicate):
* PIN: 41.7 FG%, 34.7 3P%, 51.2 REB (13.9 O), 18.6 A, 18.8 ST, 7.6 TO, 15.7 PF
* Opp: 40.9 FG%, 17.4 3P%, 64.5 REB (18.6 O), 15.7 A, 4.9 ST, 22.3 TO, 17.4 PF


Salisbury Auerbachs (22777), GM-JuicePats

14-8, 3rd place (Big 8, NBBA, USA)
(Differential +158, Pythagorean record: 15.4-6.6)
Roster: 11 players, Age 25.4, Salary 294.0K (26.7K/player)

Game strategy (32 competitive matches):
* Offense: Run and Gun 13, Look Inside 11, Patient 3, Base Offense 2, Low Post 2, Motion 1
* Defense: 2-3 Zone 15, Man to Man 11, 1-3-1 Zone 3, 3-2 Zone 3
* Enthusiasm: 9 less (0 TIE vs CT), 21 equal, 2 more (0 CT vs TIE)

Overall stats (max bbstat: 134 (10657707) vs Lake Merritt Arrows):
* SAL: 40.6 FG%, 32.0 3P%, 58.4 REB (15.6 O), 17.3 A, 4.9 ST, 5.9 TO, 16.5 PF
* Opp: 36.8 FG%, 25.6 3P%, 52.9 REB (13.7 O), 15.8 A, 2.9 ST, 7.9 TO, 15.5 PF


Wake Forest (22795), WFU03

11-11, 5th place (Big 8, NBBA, USA)
(Differential -24, Pythagorean record: 10.3-11.7)
Roster: 13 players, Age 24.2, Salary 213.9K (16.5K/player)

Game strategy (23 competitive matches):
* Offense: Look Inside 20, Run and Gun 1, Base Offense 1, Low Post 1
* Defense: Man to Man 12, 2-3 Zone 7, 3-2 Zone 3, Full Court Press 1
* Enthusiasm: 4 less (0 TIE vs CT), 13 equal, 6 more (0 CT vs TIE)

Overall stats (max bbstat: 122 (10475519) vs atl estacion):
* WFU: 37.8 FG%, 18.1 3P%, 57.1 REB (14.7 O), 17.0 A, 3.8 ST, 8.4 TO, 15.5 PF
* Opp: 38.2 FG%, 26.4 3P%, 55.7 REB (14.9 O), 15.2 A, 4.7 ST, 7.2 TO, 16.4 PF

From: wozzvt
This Post:
00
94230.6 in reply to 94230.5
Date: 6/3/2009 12:40:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
Thanks, but I was already depressed enough by the salary comparison.

This Post:
00
94230.7 in reply to 94230.5
Date: 6/3/2009 1:54:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
178178
For a numbers geek like myself, that is absolutely awesome. Thanks for posting.

p.s. I've heard of the Pythagorean record a million times, but I never quite understood it. Anyone know? Something about expected wins, but I dunno what it's based on.

This Post:
00
94230.8 in reply to 94230.7
Date: 6/3/2009 1:58:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_record)

I don't have the script that generated that data handy, but I think I eyeballed an exponent of 10 for BB.

This Post:
00
94230.9 in reply to 94230.8
Date: 6/3/2009 2:01:03 PM
Myopic Marauders
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
The problem with the Pythagorean formula is that it assumes you are trying to win every game in the league and ignores the cup.

This Post:
00
94230.10 in reply to 94230.9
Date: 6/3/2009 2:05:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
The problem with the Pythagorean formula is that it assumes you are trying to win every game in the league and ignores the cup.


Absolutely true. It is what it is.

This Post:
00
94230.11 in reply to 94230.9
Date: 6/3/2009 2:30:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Inquiry, trying less vs trying more = just that or is it really CT vs TIE? I don't recall many games I CT...... except for one :)

Last edited by Digging for Change at 6/3/2009 2:33:15 PM

This Post:
00
94230.12 in reply to 94230.8
Date: 6/3/2009 3:03:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Are those numbers based on the old model? How much relevance do you think they will have with the changes?

This is where I wish we could have the HT old versus new games. Where we could see what would happen under both conditions.

This Post:
00
94230.13 in reply to 94230.11
Date: 6/3/2009 3:47:22 PM
Myopic Marauders
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
I was the referring to not playing starters in an away league game in favor of the cup.

This Post:
00
94230.14 in reply to 94230.13
Date: 6/3/2009 3:49:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
I know, sorry - I couldn't help myself there.

Suffice to say, it's good stuff that we should have more of.....

Advertisement