BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > What offense

What offense

Set priority
Show messages by
From: bonespawn

This Post:
00
148127.5 in reply to 148127.4
Date: 6/27/2010 3:55:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
The reason I said look inside was based on comments I have read in the forums accounting for the success of some teams with a very good inside focused SF and playing the look inside strategy vs other combos. I'm not sure if GM-Rip's suggestion was based under the assumption of a outside focused SF or a balanced one, but from my limited observation this is all subjective. I'm not qualified to debate, but it would interest me if there is supporting data that says otherwise. In any case, you should obviously play to your strengths and not expect greatness out of an inside focused SF playing a motion offense for example.

From: zyler

This Post:
00
148127.6 in reply to 148127.4
Date: 6/27/2010 3:56:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
and id say of the above three managers one has and outside focused sf , one has an inside focused sf and the other has a balanced sf.

it depends on the skills of your sf , he will perform better in tactics that utilize his skill set.

From: Rycka

This Post:
00
148127.7 in reply to 148127.6
Date: 6/27/2010 3:59:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
also i would add, there is no inside or outside orientated sf. theres a sg at sf position or a pf at sf position. but thats where opinions gets divided.

From: bonespawn

To: RiP
This Post:
00
148127.9 in reply to 148127.8
Date: 6/27/2010 4:15:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Balanced, inside and outside focused SFs are all discussed in the FAQ:

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/forum/read.aspx?thr...)

This Post:
00
148127.10 in reply to 148127.9
Date: 6/27/2010 4:48:24 PM
LionPride
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
well the reason I asked this was because originally I was going to put my dominant center at SF for my game 3 tonight, because I am always predictable in running LI or Low Post and didn't want to lose because of playing an inside based offense. My center is my best player by far and didn't want to take him out of the game so SF seemed pretty safe. However my center has 1 OD, and 5 JS I was trying to find the offense that uses the SF for more of a mid range game. I know Princeton, Motion, R@G are outside based, and I am not using LI or LP, so the safest bet is Base PTB, or patient.

Just thought you guys would like to know my reasoning.

This Post:
00
148127.12 in reply to 148127.11
Date: 6/27/2010 7:39:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Lots of layup attempts. High DR + low IS = "tries a driving layup. Shot missed."

This Post:
00
148127.13 in reply to 148127.12
Date: 6/27/2010 11:08:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
You sure? Cause I'm not so sure. I'm guessing that the game engine uses the driving skill rating vs ID skill rating (as the shot is taken).

This Post:
00
148127.14 in reply to 148127.1
Date: 6/27/2010 11:25:03 PM
LionPride
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
Well I won my finals game 3 playing princeton, and my SF's combined got 32 points 7 rebounds but only 1 assists.

This Post:
00
148127.15 in reply to 148127.13
Date: 6/28/2010 12:31:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Axis123: Unless the game engine changed following BB-Mark saying it worked that way then yes, I am sure:

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/forum/read.aspx?thr...)

I had some players with very good driving but atrocious inside shot. These players had a tendency to drive, but would miss a sick amount of layups. I guess that is why I felt compelled to comment, because this sort of hurt me at one point. I understand driving may be heavily weighed upon but it is my understanding that driving and passing create looks and this is separate from shot making.

oriolekid: you the man




Advertisement