BuzzerBeater Forums

honestly, I still have no idea what you are saying, your grammar is horrific.

If I understood what you were talking about, I would be able to form an opinion, but so far my opinion still stands at wtf, simply because i cannot understand your on-going battle with the English language.

i dont care about a full stop missing, or an apostrophe missing here or there, or a small spelling error, but seriously, I get more understanding out of people in the forums where english is not their first language, than when compared to your horribly written 'english'.

if english is not your first language thats fine, i will sympathize, but irrespective of this, someone who DOES have English as a first language is having a very hard time understanding what you are talking about.

The result of this is that your posts are going un-heard. the community cannot decipher what you are talking about. You sound like you have some interesting idea's about the game and thats great, but being so terrible at expressing them means that they are falling on deaf ears, people do not have the time to try and decipher your cryptic garbled 'short statements'.

So keep short statementing all you like, but unfortunately it seems for you, that very few are listening.

Suggestion for you and im being serious. Write your posts, copy and paste them into Microsoft word. If you see any spelling errors, fix them, if you see any green underlined sentences, re-write them. that will at least be a starting point for you.

I’ve used 1-3-1 against good r&g teams and killed them on the other end, with forwards who have good od/id and can score inside.

but generally 2-3 is where it’s at. i’ve KOed a lot of bigger, more expensive teams with my high OD and team SB forcing turnovers, and high hnd/drv on the other end getting their bigs into foul trouble.

ultimately in this game you need balanced players and strategic flexibility. then if you need a mono big later for an extra punch, they’re always on the TL for cheap.

I'm gonna stick up for Mr. Glass here on one point, the "2-3 man to man". My favorite college basketball team, the michigan state Spartans used to run a "Matchup 2-3 zone" under their old coach Jud Heathcote. This defense was a zone base but defenders shifted and at times it even looked lik a 3-2 zone depending on the offensive set. The idea was to not get stuck in a bad matchup on the zone. So if a good perimeter player drove to the baseline, the forward and guard would switch spots in the "zone" (it usually looked like man defense on the ball). They also used a fair amount of trapping out of this set.