BuzzerBeater Forums

Its a man to man work but as a zone when needed based on skills advantage of the foe so you can defend them.. I think highly possible to do. They added box 1 on the game which is way more complicated in my opinion. . 2/3 m2m is like a hybrid that adapts to the player skills. you don't need switch anything to be honest. Its put the right person in the right place to defend.

Kind of like camo.. you don't need to do any much, but set it right. in the right setting, at the right time.. I dont think its a massive problem for Bb staff to do so... Only problem is none want to be fair to one another. Everybody wants the upper hand on one another that include Bb staff. So yes they will be lazy and ignore to add this wonderful thing because again. why should even the game up and make it fair in tactics


People are paying for Li advantage.. If some think not and that's a joke look at the market.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 11/19/2014 2:55:09 PM

Thank you. So I knew I was right tactics are certain skill based. Every tactic need a certain amount of skill to run it correctly and there is penalty for wrong skill styled players in every tactic.


This is very sad news to hear because the market is only based towards a few player types and a lot badly built. So In small any defense can beat another if its rightly skilled. Which is why we see Li an Lp killing everybody on the defensive side because manger don't know what they need to make it run effectively.

Thanks

Some great copying and pasting: (http://www.hoopsu.com/combination-man-zone-defense/)

honestly, I still have no idea what you are saying, your grammar is horrific.

If I understood what you were talking about, I would be able to form an opinion, but so far my opinion still stands at wtf, simply because i cannot understand your on-going battle with the English language.

i dont care about a full stop missing, or an apostrophe missing here or there, or a small spelling error, but seriously, I get more understanding out of people in the forums where english is not their first language, than when compared to your horribly written 'english'.

if english is not your first language thats fine, i will sympathize, but irrespective of this, someone who DOES have English as a first language is having a very hard time understanding what you are talking about.

The result of this is that your posts are going un-heard. the community cannot decipher what you are talking about. You sound like you have some interesting idea's about the game and thats great, but being so terrible at expressing them means that they are falling on deaf ears, people do not have the time to try and decipher your cryptic garbled 'short statements'.

So keep short statementing all you like, but unfortunately it seems for you, that very few are listening.

Suggestion for you and im being serious. Write your posts, copy and paste them into Microsoft word. If you see any spelling errors, fix them, if you see any green underlined sentences, re-write them. that will at least be a starting point for you.

I’ve used 1-3-1 against good r&g teams and killed them on the other end, with forwards who have good od/id and can score inside.

but generally 2-3 is where it’s at. i’ve KOed a lot of bigger, more expensive teams with my high OD and team SB forcing turnovers, and high hnd/drv on the other end getting their bigs into foul trouble.

ultimately in this game you need balanced players and strategic flexibility. then if you need a mono big later for an extra punch, they’re always on the TL for cheap.

I'm gonna stick up for Mr. Glass here on one point, the "2-3 man to man". My favorite college basketball team, the michigan state Spartans used to run a "Matchup 2-3 zone" under their old coach Jud Heathcote. This defense was a zone base but defenders shifted and at times it even looked lik a 3-2 zone depending on the offensive set. The idea was to not get stuck in a bad matchup on the zone. So if a good perimeter player drove to the baseline, the forward and guard would switch spots in the "zone" (it usually looked like man defense on the ball). They also used a fair amount of trapping out of this set.