this actually goes back to some of my previous posts
the assumption is made that - because player X took the most shots, he is the best offensive player that the And1 defender should be defending...... This is a wrong assumption....
Iin actual fact this is not always true and from what i can see with Box defenses, a very incorrect assumption.
Logic would suggest that - if your best defender totally smothers your opponents best offensive player, he should in theory take zero shots.
when the best offensive player is guarded too well, so the offensive team looks to another player to take shots. Which is why you will often see strange results in terms of box scores.
ill just state it again so its easy to identify for future readers.
With a box defense.... in the final box score - the player who took the most shots in the game- is NOT necessarily the best offensive player whom the 'And1' was defending
im not telling opposite, im just cheking who guard man to man and whodid in zone, not checking how many shots but who guards,
its too casualty 22 shots guarded by the same man if that was a zone,
logic says that was the man to man situation
no black needed