BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Playoff-questions

Playoff-questions

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
236.28 in reply to 236.27
Date: 7/17/2007 6:08:15 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
88
another possibility is that like real sports, that players don't get paid more for making the playoffs.. and that salaries should stop being paid for the playoffs. Also I think it was the case that we balanced the cost/revenue without thinking about those weeks that people didn't have revenue... so maybe revenue needs a bump across the board. On the other hand I don't think 3,2,1 extra weeks out of 20 is really an unreasonable advantage... remember only 2 teams are getting 3 weeks, 2 others getting 2, and 4 getting 1. Most of the league is in the same boat... so although I'm sure it looks nasty to your bottom line it really is prety much the same across the board. Now of course you didn't really anticipate this cash flow problem was going to come up .. and that's really what you are reacting too i think. You want to be able to look at your weekly revenue/expenses and know if you are under/over budget. I think that's a reasonable request and we should brainstorm for ways to make that happen.

One way is to make playoff salaries free. So rather than the benefit being they get income and expenses.. and you get expenses, its they get income and neither of you get expenses. Course then you need to deal with people trying to just buy players for the playoffs etc. having a transfer deadline might not be a bad idea.. just like the NBA and most other american sports.

This Post:
00
236.30 in reply to 236.29
Date: 7/17/2007 3:34:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
then make it +2.

I like the idea, but maybe it would be more realistic to normalize the wages by the number of weeks in the regular season divided by the total number of weeks (salary * 22 / 25), instead of "free playoff wages".

Just a suggestion, i like the idea anyhow.

This Post:
00
236.31 in reply to 236.30
Date: 7/17/2007 3:45:08 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
88
well sure that would be part of it.. except i don't know if we normalized the economy by the total revenue/expenses or whether we did it week by week. If it was the latter than not normalizing would correct for that issue.

This Post:
00
236.33 in reply to 236.32
Date: 7/18/2007 12:14:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
no more official games for the people out of the playoffs, but what about the guys playing for the title without getting payed??

but anyway, for me it's fine either way.

Edited 7/18/2007 12:18:19 AM by arvie7

This Post:
00
236.35 in reply to 236.34
Date: 7/18/2007 4:56:11 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
88
i don't really understand what you meant there domenico...

This Post:
00
236.37 in reply to 236.36
Date: 7/18/2007 5:20:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
I was afraid that's what you met..

no no, dude, nobody was talking about "free playoff wages" just for the teams out of the playoffs. It would be for everybody, otherwise makes no sense whatsoever...

From: BB-Mark

This Post:
00
236.38 in reply to 236.37
Date: 7/29/2007 6:48:02 AM
Molson Canadians
III.4
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
The problem also becomes less prominent if we make up for the game difference with additional scrimmages, and have some (reduced) ticket income for scrimmages (split between the teams).

Advertisement