BuzzerBeater Forums

I have no inside knowledge, but I promise you, that there will be no tax for teams with ~10 million in savings. 10 mil is like nothing these days....

Which is why we're advocating action on tanking rather than bank accounts...

Tanking is long-term process when manager intentionally plays at lower level than his bank account says he should.
I am ok with tax over specific number fex 3 top players (now about 15-20M).
But i really think FAN SURVEY should be redesigned. I d redesign fan survey value of "last season result" which could determined on comparing money ranking (last season money accumulated by team) vs cup and league ranking based on teams results. And d switch impact of "last game result" with "last season". Both could affect tanking.

I have no inside knowledge, but I promise you, that there will be no tax for teams with ~10 million in savings. 10 mil is like nothing these days....

Which is why we're advocating action on tanking rather than bank accounts...

Well, some of that argument comes from guys protecting their bank accounts, too.

I think a good preventative measure to punish outright blanket tanking would be to raise the salary floor at all levels. Then impose a dollar for dollar tax for every dollar payroll is under the floor on a weekly basis. If you are 30k under the floor, 30k comes off the books each week at the financial update.

I understand there is no benefit to being under the tax floor. There is however benefit to selling off the whole roster and being 200k under the floor. Then you have a much larger pile of cash when you are ready to spend.

By first raising the floor, then implementing the tax, you force tanking teams to decide whether to keep salary on the roster to avoid tax or or take a hit. Leaves them with less of a bank vault. If it was dollar for dollar tax, no team is going to go 200K below the floor and collect every dollar they can by selling off their entire roster.

The selling off of an entire roster is done for two reasons. One, build a massive stock pile of cash, and two, get rid of talent while their value is at peak while you are planning to not be competitive. It makes no sense to keep a 30 year old player in his prime if you are just going to tank for a few seasons. Sell him off for max cash while you crash.

I get the newish team argument. That would have to be addressed somehow, but the above kills a lot of the value in complete tanking.

Yes an extra 40k, hence the dollar for dollar tax.

Just match it. But keep in mind you would have resources tied up in players and not just disposable cash sitting in your bank waiting for you to make your big move.

That's a good point. Without a roster size limit, it wouldn't work.