BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Level of Jump Range

Level of Jump Range

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
163400.9 in reply to 163400.1
Date: 11/7/2010 3:47:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
My impression of Jump Range is that it improves the player's accuracy as he moves increasingly farther from the basket.

For example, let's say we have a center with atrocious jump range. He can effectively dunk and tip the ball in at a clip of 30% (made-up percentage), but his jump shot from 1 meter (made-up distance) has only a 10% (made up) chance of going in. If he were to pop in JR, his dunking would increase to 32%(made up), and his 1-meter jumper would go to 16% (made up), while his ability to make a 1.25 meter jump shot would begin to exist at 3% (made up).

When we get to people with higher jump range, they're probably not going to increase the distance from which they can shoot, but rather their outside shots would become more accurate.

Anyways, to the original question, I would recommend for you to have jump range to be one or two levels below jump shot. It's useless to have a good range if you can't actually shoot the ball, so go for jump shooting first.

This Post:
00
163400.10 in reply to 163400.9
Date: 11/7/2010 7:19:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
194194
I c, that makes sense. so like Mod-CrazyEye said, JR can be little blow JS.

This Post:
00
163400.11 in reply to 163400.10
Date: 11/7/2010 8:29:18 PM
Kitakyushu
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
12351235
My SG has level 18 JS and 11 JR. He still hits 3's but the 11 JR keeps his salary down. My best shooter ever was a 16 JS and a 13 JR.

From: pmfg10
This Post:
11
163400.13 in reply to 163400.12
Date: 11/7/2010 8:48:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
Don't forget driving + IS

From: Hadron

This Post:
00
163400.14 in reply to 163400.13
Date: 11/8/2010 7:17:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
How important is IS for SGs? If you play something like look inside what % of the SG's shots will be inside shots?

This Post:
00
163400.15 in reply to 163400.14
Date: 11/8/2010 7:29:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
194194
Well SG is mostly playing outside whether it's inside or outside tactic (maybe less outside for inside tactic but generally, still outside compared to others). So I'm not sure how IS can help SG very much, unless he has a good driving.

This Post:
00
163400.16 in reply to 163400.15
Date: 11/8/2010 8:14:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
205205
or rebounding, as there might be putbacks, too.

generalls speaking, your SG should have better IS than your opponents' SGs ID. But how much that is depends on the league etc. a SG with rebounding and IS respectable and driving prominent or higher can be quite an inside force though. Still, most shots a SG takes are from outside or even the perimeter. So JS and JR are way more important than IS.

This Post:
00
163400.17 in reply to 163400.16
Date: 11/8/2010 10:49:23 AM
Phoenix_Suns
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
177177
I wonder how much the IS influences on the SG´s shots when he drives to the basket. If it has more than marginal effect, would it be wise to have decent "Driving" with bad IS? I have never trained my guards in IS as it takes really long and you have to put them on the wrong positions. I doubt though that that is the way BB calculates drives and layups from guards.

This Post:
00
163400.18 in reply to 163400.17
Date: 11/8/2010 11:07:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
295295
That's a question i've asked myself for quite a while too, unfortunately there are no data out there or at least none which I heard of. But from my personal experience I can tell I have a guard with now prolific driving and atrocious IS and he misses an awful lot of layups... Is there someone who can say something reliable about this?

This Post:
22
163400.19 in reply to 163400.18
Date: 11/8/2010 12:21:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
272272
i can give you a link, where someone reliable said something :)

(33639.14)

Advertisement