BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > National Team Debate Thread

National Team Debate Thread (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: southpaw17

To: SM
This Post:
11
208821.80 in reply to 208821.79
Date: 2/9/2012 4:23:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
As I wrote in a previous post...
I think number 3 is the way to go, however its going to take some time to where we can get there. I know a few managers have talked about taking on the project of developing some of the specialty players which is awesome because as proved by poland, specialty players can pose problems but when push comes to shove the only way to make it successful is to still have the meat and potatoes type guards and big guys as a base and then mix in those specialty players to create the advantage they were designed for.
... I too believe that secondaries are a way we can close the gap on the rest of the world.

Additionally, do you feel that there is a difference in how an NT player should be developed early on as opposed to a U21 player?


I do... And I'm implementing that with my pf prospect. Right now the standard is to pump primaries early and get to secondaries later.... I don't agree with this for 2 reasons...

1. For our specialty guys they most likely aren't going to make the U21 anyway so I think getting secondaries trained first is critical because often it is gonna train slower and so while they are young get them pumped out ASAP.

2. The idea of going back and training secondaries last is asinine for the simple reason that you have a huge salaried player that is already hurting your team economy and now you have to play them out of position so they are hurting your team further? C'mon. Get the secondaries done in their first season to season and a half and then pump the primaries. This would apply to everyone but mostly pf's and inside playable guards.

Edit/side note

I think #2 is the reason our bigs fall short... We get them to the point where they are on the fringe of being on the NT and then we tell the manager we need you to play your center at pg to get a passing pop or he doesnt have enough handling etc. And they get frustrated because they have been following our training plan and its still not good enough.

Last edited by southpaw17 at 2/9/2012 4:48:31 PM

From: SM

To: Coco
This Post:
00
208821.82 in reply to 208821.81
Date: 2/9/2012 5:00:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9494
Finally and more experimentally it may be worthwhile to create some players whose major offensive asset is neither js nor is but driving.


That's an intriguing idea, especially considering the relative affordability of driving. What sort of overall skills would you have in mind for such a player?

From: evmyster9

To: Coco
This Post:
00
208821.83 in reply to 208821.4
Date: 2/9/2012 5:22:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Lots of respect to you Coco your team is historically good and you have my vote for this election my goal is to be a part of a national team in the near future as my Iowa State Cyclones continue to progress. Good luck to you this election

Message deleted
Message deleted
Message deleted
Message deleted
Message deleted
From: jfarb

This Post:
11
208821.89 in reply to 208821.83
Date: 2/9/2012 5:26:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
556556
Double posts happen all of the time, triple posts also, but a sextuple post??

This Post:
00
208821.90 in reply to 208821.63
Date: 2/9/2012 7:10:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
244244
Ok, sounds ok, I'll repeat the question for the other candidates. What are your plans/goals for success? This has several parts, how would you define succes, if performance wise how far do we need to go to succeed, if training/advancement how much better do we need to get?

Advertisement