BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The Great Micro-nation Debate

The Great Micro-nation Debate

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
44
278268.747 in reply to 278268.746
Date: 5/14/2016 10:11:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
592592
Merge with Marge?

I think Homer would be pissed off

X'D

Howl to the Moon, you won't regret it.
This Post:
11
278268.748 in reply to 278268.745
Date: 5/14/2016 10:45:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
please stop telling us how to play.

Sure ... when you stop. Until then, everybody has an opinion whether you like it or not.

Last edited by Mike Franks at 5/14/2016 10:46:12 AM

This Post:
00
278268.749 in reply to 278268.747
Date: 5/14/2016 11:28:35 AM
Kitakyushu
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
12431243
Opps...spellcheck got me on the third MERGE!!!!!

This Post:
11
278268.750 in reply to 278268.748
Date: 5/14/2016 7:07:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
please stop telling us how to play.

Sure ... when you stop. Until then, everybody has an opinion whether you like it or not.

I am not allowed to tell me how to play? That's an... interesting take. Mayhaps you could actually read what you're typing?

Note Mike: I've never once told you what you're experience should be. I have numerous times offered alternatives to the one, singular, vanilla experience you think micro-nations should have.

Last edited by malice at 5/14/2016 7:08:59 PM

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
11
278268.751 in reply to 278268.750
Date: 5/14/2016 11:54:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
I have numerous times offered alternatives to the one, singular, vanilla experience you think micro-nations should have.
Obviously you're thinking of someone else, because I have never offered such an opinion, and actually don't really care what experience mocro-nations should have. My only viewpoint is what would be good for the game, and I don't really distinguish between big or small nations because we're all in this together. You might think you're special and entitled or even that all micro-nations are special and entitled, but I don't.

And by the way, everybody still has an opinion whether you like it or not.

Last edited by Mike Franks at 5/15/2016 12:01:27 AM

This Post:
00
278268.752 in reply to 278268.751
Date: 5/15/2016 12:29:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
I have numerous times offered alternatives to the one, singular, vanilla experience you think micro-nations should have.
Obviously you're thinking of someone else, because I have never offered such an opinion, and actually don't really care what experience mocro-nations should have. My only viewpoint is what would be good for the game, and I don't really distinguish between big or small nations because we're all in this together.


Gee... how awesome. You might want to check the title of this thread, and take your broken-record self into a new thread.
There's a good chap.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
From: LA-Bernspin

To: RiP
This Post:
33
278268.753 in reply to 278268.752
Date: 5/15/2016 7:08:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
197197
I couldn't read the whole thread, but I would like to share something.

Why not merge all the leagues and create one single world league?

Teams would be assigned spots on the world league depending on their world rankings. The first 16 would make division I, next 64 division II, next 256 division III and so on. The whole current BB community would fit in 6 divisions. Teams would keep their flags, players would still make their NTs. The Cup would be kept and upgraded, turning into the national championship, played on a system similar to B3 (round robin matches + playoffs).

That would end the problems of lack of competitiveness of small leagues and also tackle the unbalance of $ between big and small leagues.

This Post:
00
278268.754 in reply to 278268.753
Date: 5/15/2016 7:25:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
So... basically the B3 on a huge scale.

The major issue with this, would be the risk. As has been pointed out, there are people here that rely on this game to pay the bills, and something like that could possibly end or severely restrict the finances that BB makes.
Honestly? I can't imagine it'd attract NEW users, and would probably (?) lose current ones.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
11
278268.756 in reply to 278268.755
Date: 5/15/2016 5:18:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
The reality of any online game is that people leave. The key is getting new people in. And even then - the key (for longevity) is getting people to *pay*. New users don't leave because of a lack of competition. New users leave because they get the crap beat out of them because they've been put in a league that's too strong.

Now, the game you propose would take - quite literally - years of being invested to succeed. And even then, only one team per season can ultimately be the div 1 winner. It's not a recipe for success.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
278268.757 in reply to 278268.752
Date: 5/15/2016 10:42:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
You might want to check the title of this thread ...
The fact is that every country will be affected by what they ultimately choose, and everyone has a say. You might check BB-Ryan's OP in this thread for yourself:
- We welcome the opinion of everyone
Of course they do, because everyone will be affected.

Last edited by Mike Franks at 5/15/2016 10:51:33 PM

Advertisement