BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Why 3-2?

Why 3-2?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Marcus
This Post:
00
290960.70 in reply to 290960.69
Date: 4/22/2018 4:21:48 AM
Freccianera
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
4848
In my last game 3-2(+ prediction) sucks -> http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/100918045/boxscore.aspx
It is true that my roster was not very suitable but I was expecting something more.
Starter skills:
PG 14OD 5ID
SG 16OD 6ID
AP 13OD 9ID
AG 13ID 6SB
C 16ID 6SB

From: Marcus

This Post:
00
290960.73 in reply to 290960.72
Date: 4/29/2018 3:07:37 PM
Freccianera
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
4848
Yes, levels of defenses are low even for the second Italian division. At the moment I'm focusing on training and I do not care about being competitive. To be safe in my league you should have guards with at least 16 in OD and big man with at least 15 in ID.

This Post:
00
290960.74 in reply to 290960.73
Date: 7/6/2018 4:55:14 PM
Zero Gravity
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
185185
Second Team:
Ground Zero
Hi Folks,

I will be playing my conference final tomorrow against a team playing always outside tactic with normal pace.
Pg, SG and SF are strong outside scorer, especially SF.
I`d be happy to hear a couple of comments whether 3-2 or m2m should be the best for me.

Here are my defensive stats:
Pg1: 15 OD, ID 10, SB 8
Pg2: 14 OD, Id 10, SB 10
SG: 16 OD, 7 ID SB 4
SF: 16 OD, 16 ID, Sb 7
PF: 15 ID, 15 SB, 12 RB
C: 17 ID, 6 SB, 16 RB

Thank you,
Z.

From: hene10
This Post:
11
290960.75 in reply to 290960.74
Date: 7/6/2018 6:16:29 PM
Don't know if you have any experience from 3-2 zone with players you have, have it worked?

With quick look at your situation, I suggest to play 3-2 zone. Looks like you will get RB's enough with that zone defense, and your OD rating is going to be nice too. If you're sure he will play with motion, just add right GDP and you are going to win. Also same atittude will be neeed, I think.

Good luck, what ever you decide to do!

This Post:
00
290960.76 in reply to 290960.75
Date: 7/7/2018 5:58:42 AM
Zero Gravity
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
185185
Second Team:
Ground Zero
I have never played 3-2 before, only m2m.
My team is relatively good, however this is a strong league, even if I win my conference final, the final could be though as well.
My next opponent been playing motion since the beginning, I have checked his stats back to 10 games.
I think we are pretty much equal but with different set up.
This is why I`m asking whether my defensive line up ok to play effective 3-2, and worth to try or just stick with M2m and hope that I can outplay him abroad?

Thanks,
Sz.

This Post:
00
290960.78 in reply to 290960.77
Date: 7/7/2018 8:02:20 AM
Zero Gravity
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
185185
Second Team:
Ground Zero
I would say for these kind of games, my line up is with 7 players. Those 5 that I gave you earlier are the starting 5. (Pg1 and Pg2 in question, because which I should I prefer, the 1+ od or the 2+ SB). however Subs players are much lower in OD, and one of them is obviously for C or PF.
Ok so far 1 vote for 3-2 and one to stick with m2m.
Sz.

Advertisement