BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > National Team?

National Team?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
23982.66 in reply to 23982.65
Date: 4/13/2008 1:42:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
or they should have an option to say 'no' to the election of that player.


i prefer this option.

like Totti did with the italian NT

This Post:
00
23982.68 in reply to 23982.61
Date: 4/13/2008 2:31:04 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
777777
just increase merchandising for teams with NT players
the final effect would be the same, but it's a more realistic way to implement it IMO

it would more realistic, but the net effect would still be the same… if your incomes increase by X or your expenses decrease by X it's exactly the same thing.


i know, i said it myself
but it would be a more acceptable way to put it since it seems it's gonna happen no matter what

This Post:
00
23982.69 in reply to 23982.63
Date: 4/13/2008 2:32:39 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
777777

and i think a strong player will give you more W, so you receive more cash.

Wrong, because with inefficient training your whole team becomes worse. You are making one player better slowly, while your team could be improving much faster. So your NT player gets better, your teams gets worse than it could be, so you don't win more W's than you would.



and how giving you money to do this is helping you?

This Post:
00
23982.70 in reply to 23982.69
Date: 4/13/2008 3:12:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
and how giving you money to do this is helping you?

It compensates at least a little. Doesn't make it an economical advantage, but at least avoids an economical disaster for the team.

Dude, you say that having NT players with salary discounts would be giving a financial advantage to the teams that have them, and I say that It is NOT. This is a mathematical thing, and it's very simple. I think the BBs know the economy system of BB better than all of us together, and plus they are pretty smart, so they will know what needs to be done.

This Post:
00
23982.71 in reply to 23982.70
Date: 4/13/2008 4:59:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
When I read through this topic I see a lot of potential problems (and solutions) that arise if NT match mode is changed. So again I would like to ask:

What is wrong with arcade and why does this option needs to be changed?

Is it only the incentive that managers want to be rewarded for having NT players? I think that using arcade can best be used to see which team really is the best.

From: Pericle

To: ned
This Post:
00
23982.73 in reply to 23982.3
Date: 4/13/2008 6:05:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
330330
Dunno when it will be done but today there isn't necessity to make this "free" contribution. Probably neither in the future if the injury will be cancelled from National team matchs, that's my point of view ;)


Quote

This Post:
00
23982.75 in reply to 23982.73
Date: 4/13/2008 7:03:47 PM
AS Barroom Heroes
III.13
Overall Posts Rated:
10331033
Second Team:
Lone Pine Productions
Dunno when it will be done but today there isn't necessity to make this "free" contribution. Probably neither in the future if the injury will be cancelled from National team matchs, that's my point of view ;)


Quote

Double quote.

This Post:
00
23982.76 in reply to 23982.71
Date: 4/13/2008 10:30:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
What is wrong with arcade and why does this option needs to be changed?


It's not arcade mode to begin with, so to have it arcade mode would necessitate a change.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Advertisement