Some ideas...
- Having top leagues as a local conglomerate...
- Having a second tier for smaller nations ...
...
From reading here, it seems like the majority of those who are *for* this move are from nations that it doesn't even impact. Those from smaller nations seem to be split, but the majority (certainly not vast) tend to not want the straight-Utopian-merge, but something which allows them to participate in what *could* be the best of both worlds.
My main concern is that this is merely a bandaid over a gaping wound, with the lifeblood of BB pouring out. Anyone who sees this as the primary concern for Buzzerbeater at the moment isn't seeing the forest for the trees.
Conglomerate on top, retain the small nation advantages for everyone else ... what a great idea for retaining the financial advantages of small nations. It is no wonder the small nations would like that idea; it keeps the very imbalance that a "merge" is designed to level out.
As far as nations that would not be impacted by even the smallest reshuffle, here is the entire list:
1. ___
We are all in this together and even the slightest reshuffle would impact everyone, at least financially.
You're right in your final paragraph. Of that there can be no doubt. Anything less than a complete reshuffle is nothing but a bandaid, or as I have said, rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
"We're all in this together"... yet here *you* are, telling us what our experience is.
Quoting BBRyan in the initial post of this thread...
- We welcome the opinion of everyone, but understand that we are most concerned with the opinions of those that will be directly affected by any potential change. That means the managers from micro-nations.
- If you're not a manager from a micro-nation, please don't attempt to speak on the behalf of those that are.
"...what a great idea for retaining the financial advantages of small nations." - overplayed, dude. I really don't think you have the slightest idea of the "financials" of a small nation team.
"...it keeps the very imbalance that a "merge" is designed to level out." - erm, say what? You're saying that the primary reason for a proposed merge is to "level the playing field"? Where was that mentioned?
"rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic." - yet you're advocating something that would alienate even more members...
Last edited by malice at 4/22/2016 12:12:33 PM
http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan