BuzzerBeater Forums

Of course nobody is going to name it like that, this is just an example of how this could be called. But the name would be quite accurate. In reply to Perpete: Really? If my memory doesn't deceive me, the term "Utopia" was used to describe a new country, where second teams would play.

No I think he means like a whole separate server. Like a second BB almost, it would have its own market, and be completely separate from first teams. This has also been discussed.

Wouldn't that negate the financial advantage from the new Supporters?

Utopia, seriously? At least do everyone a favour and don't call it that when implementing the feature.

Schrempftopia.

You're all welcome.

(And yes, I understand the irony of using Schrempf instead of that Rik Smits fellow whose name appears in my team name, but Smitstopia just doesn't roll off the tongue like Schrempftopia. Schrempftopia. Say it once and you'll never want to stop saying it.)

When I speak about "Utopia", I'm speaking about a new country with some rules to protect us from cheating. I don't get the point of creating another server, especially for a lonely country.

I also voted no. But nothing against utopia or another server.

I like the idea of people playing in their own countries. That would break that whole concept.

If it would be implemented as utopia/new server, I might even consider supporter myself.

One interesting statistic at the end of the vote, would be, as other users mentioned, to know how many of those voting yes/no to the secondary team suggestion were supporters/non supporters.

One, equally interesting statistic to me personally, if not more, would be to have a break down of the nationalities of the users voting yes and no respectively.
We have for example same large nations, that have users contibuting to the discussion for and against the motion, we have other large nations that are absent from the discussion completely. Are they the same in the voting department??Do they vote and just dont talk about it(maybe a language barrier). Do we see any pattern in their voting behaviour?
Or we have miconations that had one user participating in the thread, regardless of their preferrences. Did the rest of their country users vote? How did they vote compared to their countryman's stated praferrence?

I also voted no. But nothing against utopia or another server.

I like the idea of people playing in their own countries. That would break that whole concept.

If it would be implemented as utopia/new server, I might even consider supporter myself.

Aren't we all Earthlings/Human Beings? Why should it matter where 1 was born/or resides, its still on Earth.

Oh yes we are, but don't be so philosophical. There's just a too big gap between different cultures.