That's not what I said at all. That's a very twisted perspective you got there... They will train old players because they are patriotic and want to support their country. That's why we have NTs in this game. They don't deserve to be bankrupt because of that.of course it was an hyperbolebut i don't change my opinion. NT shouldn't come before my teamif that happens, there's something wrong
That's not what I said at all. That's a very twisted perspective you got there... They will train old players because they are patriotic and want to support their country. That's why we have NTs in this game. They don't deserve to be bankrupt because of that.
That's not what I said at all. That's a very twisted perspective you got there... They will train old players because they are patriotic and want to support their country. That's why we have NTs in this game. They don't deserve to be bankrupt because of that.of course it was an hyperbolebut i don't change my opinion. NT shouldn't come before my teamif that happens, there's something wrongThat's EXACTLY why reductions are needed.
that's your opinion
You are concerned that the salary reduction will represent a gain financially to the team that has the NT player, but you must also consider how much money they are losing by training an old player.Training a 22 year old to keep him in the NT will represent on average a X weeks delay on every pop, if compared to an 18 year old. It's like losing X weeks of training. And that's on every pop. Can you imagine how much money is lost like that? (X depends on the training and sevral factors, but you know what I mean)No, I am 100% positive that salary reductions will not represent a financial advantage to clubs with NT players. They will only reduce the financial disavantage, and hopefully make it at least bareble, otherwise the whole NT system will collapse.
With a reduction some players might still be affordable in clubteams
the problem is that, like it or not, monster players will exist. a french point guard was recently bought by a farm team, and quite a few big men play in teams whose only focus is on training them.by not having wage reductions, what the game is saying is that NT players will have to come from farm teams, as nobody sane in his mind is going to pay a $80k salary for a single player.now, if you want to stick your head in the sand and behave as if nobody will create farm teams, you're welcome to do so. I'd rather see game politics that discourage farming, but whatever. there might be more clever measures? sure, feel free to suggest one.
the problem is this some.an example:i have an italian player with 40k of salary. you have a nigerian player with 50k of salary.your player plays in NT, my player no because in italy there are stronger players.so with the salary reduction maybe you pay 40k like me but your player is stronger than mine.is this right? i don't think so