BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Most dominating team in the world?

Most dominating team in the world?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
163095.52 in reply to 163095.47
Date: 11/8/2010 10:43:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
Thats what he did my rival to beat me...bought a 500k+ monster and then ruined his future...

From: JohnnyB

This Post:
00
163095.53 in reply to 163095.51
Date: 11/8/2010 10:46:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
Exactly what i am saying...

For the reference (27505) Greek team Asigratitos won 12 'ships in 12 seasons that BB exist in Hellas. Considering that Greece has around 2300 teams then i guess that we have the winner here...

This Post:
00
163095.55 in reply to 163095.54
Date: 11/8/2010 11:17:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
Just want to add the more rounds in cup that large BB countries have...we are already on 16 teams...

Message deleted
This Post:
11
163095.57 in reply to 163095.52
Date: 11/8/2010 1:16:42 PM
BC HostivaĹ™
PrvnĂ­ liga
Overall Posts Rated:
13171317
Second Team:
Jirkov
I didn't talk about one 500k+ monster. And with specific for small country it's not so easy to ruin your future as you can save a lot of money very quickly again.

From: brian

This Post:
11
163095.58 in reply to 163095.44
Date: 11/8/2010 1:44:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
As about the B3, big countries have clear advantage in my eyes since they are countries with 70-80k higher tv contract


Depends on the country though. To counter this, top teams in big countries aren't assured of the huge finals attendance revenue and/or cup final bonus. Making the finals can be worth $1m+ over 3 games with home court advantage.

Most seasons teams that make a long run into the cup have to give up games in the league, making it much harder to get to the finals. It's nearly impossible to manage top seed in the league AND make a cup run to the final.

This also requires having a stronger/deeper lineup. In a small country, if you're int he B3, you an load up your squad for the B3 tourney and then sell off players for 7-10 weeks until the next B3. So you can offset that lower 70-80k in TV contract with lower payroll while still ensuring domestic dominance.

There's really no comparison, the smallest countries have always have, and without any major changes to revenue, always will have a competitive advantage on the international stage.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
163095.59 in reply to 163095.58
Date: 11/9/2010 12:00:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196

There's really no comparison, the smallest countries have always have, and without any major changes to revenue, always will have a competitive advantage on the international stage.



With the exception that if the top team in New Zealand had to face the top team from Mexico in the BB3 at his place the HCA would practically be wiped out because of the timing of the updates. If he has to play away then he won't even get close to a result.

This Post:
00
163095.60 in reply to 163095.59
Date: 11/9/2010 9:30:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404

There's really no comparison, the smallest countries have always have, and without any major changes to revenue, always will have a competitive advantage on the international stage.



With the exception that if the top team in New Zealand had to face the top team from Mexico in the BB3 at his place the HCA would practically be wiped out because of the timing of the updates. If he has to play away then he won't even get close to a result.

Not all the small country are in NZ-time zone...

From: Marot

This Post:
00
163095.61 in reply to 163095.55
Date: 11/10/2010 9:17:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Just want to add the more rounds in cup that large BB countries have...we are already on 16 teams...


Oh come on are you serious?

Im sorry, but someone had to say this:

This season that i've been follwing the B3 for the contest more or less i've seen different teams, matchs etc, a main part of the managers are still managers who arent used to understand the game engine, but they have no economic problems.


The most commong thing they have, big rosters(without any rookie trained) with overvalued players on their salary and this teams that has really easy to save money and they have large rosters, i've seen them making awfull tactical choices in the matches.


Apart from some managers that you can observe they manage well when they do the lineups etc, there are many others that their team was just build from the easy money. It's like when in football(soccer) a new club is bought from a rich person and starts to sign players with high salaries and changes all the roster.
That's how are build the 60-70% of the B3 teams.

And you seriously say that this kind of teams are in disadvantatge? I'm sorry, but i dont think 150-200k its going to change their lack of the GE.

PD: I'm saying this without any aim to to criticize anyone or to put any example since it's not the point, but it's surprising you make that kind of comentary's...

From: JohnnyB

This Post:
00
163095.62 in reply to 163095.61
Date: 11/11/2010 6:15:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
Real is spending so much money, but Barca wins...

Advertisement