BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Official Second Team Poll & Discussion

Official Second Team Poll & Discussion (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
254079.471 in reply to 254079.470
Date: 1/16/2014 8:44:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
I voted yes : two teams equals twice the fun !

This Post:
00
254079.472 in reply to 254079.471
Date: 1/16/2014 9:07:51 AM
Matrix Mighty Dunkers
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
10051005
You have right but only for supporters :(

I think for 5-8 seasons since this change will be implemented, when second teams will promote to 1st, 2nd 3rd leagues it will be the end of fun form many managers who has only one club because thay will see that second team of supporter is better. Hope that supporte will not have team at prime league this will be starnge when manager will set line ups for the game of his teams and thinks which one shuold wins the game and how may points :)

This Post:
66
254079.473 in reply to 254079.472
Date: 1/16/2014 9:20:11 AM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
719719
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Give me a break
Every team that currently exists has an advantage over every team that will be coming in
Do you remember the players that you get when you start?
No players, no Arena seats, no money.
If you learn like others did than you will stay ahead of the competiion

This Post:
00
254079.475 in reply to 254079.473
Date: 1/16/2014 9:38:01 AM
Matrix Mighty Dunkers
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
10051005
Mr. Gunner don not shoot me I see that You have nice gun ;) I only point the problem I see.

cheers

This Post:
55
254079.478 in reply to 254079.476
Date: 1/16/2014 12:11:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
216216
I'm having trouble understanding why anyone would be against something that has the potential to bring in money with little impact for most.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
254079.480 in reply to 254079.466
Date: 1/16/2014 1:35:50 PM
Fab Five
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
13351335
I like the idea of two teams however I think it would be a much better idea if the two teams (primary and secondary) operated under a one-line budget for the manager (with supporter of course) and that players could be trained and transferred between the team teams voiding the need to worry about buying and selling. It would, in effect, be like having an A and B team if a manager wanted to our operated as two equally competitive teams. The manager has preference.

I really like this way to go for the second team, maybe because it could be a way to fix the training. It needs some polishing, but I guess its not going to be very successfull idea.

This Post:
33
254079.481 in reply to 254079.477
Date: 1/16/2014 2:06:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13091309
If B3 was to be permitted for secondary teams as well, what would stop managers turning their primary teams into farms and look for championships and B3 glory in an smaller nation, with considerably less competition?

Wouldn't this bring chaotic circimunstances in big nation leagues, where well founded teams that are stuck in division II, even top division, with no hope of winning the title any time soon, suddenly become training teams?

And if we don't care about this aspect of the game anymore, why should there be a native country transfer restriction, for secondary teams? Isn't this restriction meant to be there, in order to avoid secondary teams functioning as farms?

I dont know, but i think we're venturing way off the initial standards, made in BB-Marin's initial post. He used repeatedly the term "secondary" team, instead of just "second".
Hence all the proposed for debate restrictions. But there is a growing pattern here, with many friend users not being satisfied with a "secondary" team, but pretty much wanting a second-very equal to the primary- one.

Advertisement