BuzzerBeater Forums

Hilfe – Deutsch > Fragen# 3

Fragen# 3 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
95851.456 in reply to 95851.455
Date: 9/9/2009 3:47:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
zur ersten formwoche gab es nur ein zitat das sie für die Form egal war, und da ist viel zufall drinne ;) Ich habe grade an anfang viele Leute die ähnliche minuten haben, und trotzdem bis zu 2 Formpunkte auseinander liegen.

Zudem schon ich die nicht trainee auch öfter während de rletzten Saison Woche, und die haben ähnliche Start in die Saison.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 9/9/2009 3:49:31 AM

This Post:
00
95851.457 in reply to 95851.455
Date: 9/9/2009 7:41:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
ja hä. genau das mein ich doch?!

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
95851.458 in reply to 95851.457
Date: 9/9/2009 8:02:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
deshalb sagt er ja das er auf deiner seite ist ;)

This Post:
00
95851.459 in reply to 95851.458
Date: 9/9/2009 8:22:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
wie ist das bei den saison 10 changes gemeint mit dem gehalt? wonach wird sich das richten wenn sich das ändern soll? und was kosten dann die teuren jungs?

This Post:
00
95851.460 in reply to 95851.459
Date: 9/9/2009 8:34:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
860860
So richtig ist mir das auch noch nicht klar, vielleicht hilft dir dieser Text aber was:

BB-Charles

What it basically means is that BuzzerBeater can't really afford to have a substantial group of players making, say, $2M/week, unless we just decide to inflate everything to cover their salaries (a bad idea for a number of reasons).

This is actually one of the side effects a problem that we created around season 3 (and have been trying to find the best solution for ever since around season 5) when we left the introduction of potential off a season in order to try and get the economy into equilibrium as quickly as possible.

The point is, these players like Cardenas are going to keep training in many cases until they reach their potential cap, and while players who are trained in a small set of skills to very high levels should have painfully high salaries, the salaries can't be so high as to make it impossible for any team to consider picking them up. While I suspect the best teams will choose depth over superstars, it should also be possible for a top division team to afford one superstar if they're willing to really skimp on depth (e.g., a superstar at $400k as part of a total $450-500k wage budget).

We're going to try to make this possible by rescaling the wages each season so that the most skilled players (as a large group) end up in a range that makes this possible; we're going to fit the entire distribution of skills to a salary scale. In the short-term, this means that for the next few seasons (until players like Cardenas have reached their potential cap) you will be getting progressively slightly more skill for your dollar. In market terms, you can think of this as a guy like Cardenas simply deciding that he's worth as much as anybody can afford to pay, but no more than that.

I suspect there will still be a few nomads out there who have a combination of very high skills which means they're just not worth building a team around, but that's really a separate question and one that's for managers rather than BBs to deal with. I think I've been quite outspoken as is on the subject of whether managers are giving players optimal training.


BB-Charles again;

Cool - so for those owning mid range players from $50-150k, we have to hope that there are many more Cardenas' being trained so that our guys in comparision get pushed further down the scale and therefore get a slight downward revision on their salaries?



Generally speaking that's right; we really look at the bulk distribution though, so if it's really only a handful of players like Cardenas, that handful of players might end up making a fortune each week. While the game can't handle 1000 players like Cardenas without creating havoc, it can handle a few. For example, this season the fourth highest salary is only $301k/week, the 10th highest is under $250k, and the 50th best player (around the median best player on a national team) is at $165k/week. We're not going to skew the wage scale to protect one or two players out of what by next season will probably be verging on 1M, and if Cardenas continues to train in the same set of skills he's been training, I'd expect his salary to end up at, well, of order twice what seems like a reasonable amount for a superstar in a top division superstar-based team. You may have a better feel for this than I do, but I predict the market will survive just fine with a very small number of such players out there, as their scarcity helps to protect their value against the large wage.

Only players under contract during the salary update will be considered, since those are the ones competing for the money.

From: N4tê

This Post:
00
95851.461 in reply to 95851.458
Date: 9/9/2009 10:36:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
ich glaub, ich lass das posten sein:(
leute, habt mitleid mit einem absolut verplanten bb-user...
und um das von vornherein zu sagen:
1. nein, kein drogenkonsum und stolz drauf^^ (in meiner gegend is das schon ne ausnahme, NICHT zu kiffen)
2. nein, auch noch kein alzheimer, hoffentlich (mit 17 wohl nicht)

wohl einfach nur das seltene verplantheits-gen!

vllt gibts ja bald mal wieder nen forum-day, dann können wir das ja mal fragen;)

This Post:
00
95851.462 in reply to 95851.461
Date: 9/9/2009 10:38:17 AM
Colo-Colo Rabenstein
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
19731973
ich vergebe dir

From: Acajou

This Post:
00
95851.463 in reply to 95851.461
Date: 9/9/2009 10:38:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
860860
Eindeutig jugendlicher Leichtsinn. Ganz klar.

Und ja, der Forum-Day ist geplant. Laut News am 19.09.

This Post:
00
95851.464 in reply to 95851.463
Date: 9/9/2009 10:44:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14871487
Mal eine ganz andere Sache:

Ich habe gerade mal ein wenig gestöbert und noch nichts dergleichen gefunden, von daher "reißt mich bitte nicht in Stücke", sollte ich einen Thread oder eine ähnliche Frage übersehen haben.

Ich habe seit dem neuen Design Probleme mit der Seite und zwar in der Form, dass ich dauernd augeloggt werde. Anscheinend läuft da wohl ein Cookie ab oder wird durch einen Klick terminiert. Bin nur ich betroffen oder ist das ein generelles Problem?

P.S.: Im Forum scheint das Problem weniger häufig aufzutreten, als wenn ich den Transfermarkt durchstöber und auf vielen verschiedenen Vereinsseiten lande; dann passiert es relativ häufig.

chrischu

From: N4tê

This Post:
00
95851.465 in reply to 95851.464
Date: 9/9/2009 10:48:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
ich glaub, du machst grad gewissen mods eine große freude, weil du vorher suchst und eig den richtigen thread wählst;)

das problem tritt bei mir nur auf, wenn ich länger nichts tue auf der seite, auf dem neuen design allerdings noch nicht.
wenn das bei dir einfach so passiert, benutz nen anderen browser oder so, da kenn ich mich nciht aus;)

aber solltest du das ausloggen nach längerer meinen, das ist meiner meinung nach normal:)

From: Acajou

This Post:
00
95851.466 in reply to 95851.464
Date: 9/9/2009 10:48:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
860860
Wenn du in der alten Version auf .org eingeloggt warst, solltest du in der neuen Version .com nutzen und umgekehrt.
Da gibts wohl Probleme mit Cookies, Cache oder sonst etwas, von dem ich keine Ahnung habe, um weitere Begründungen zu liefern.

Advertisement