i think the club comes before the NT.
if the salary is too high, you sell the player or you stop to train him.
in the first case someone else can train him, in the second another player will play in the NT.
i prefer see disadvantage in the NT than in the club. because with the salary reduction a club has an advantage, while if a NT lose a player is not the end of the world.
You are concerned that the salary reduction will represent a gain financially to the team that has the NT player, but you must also consider how much money they are
losing by training an old player.
Training a 22 year old to keep him in the NT will represent on average a X weeks delay on every pop, if compared to an 18 year old. It's like losing X weeks of training. And that's
on every pop. Can you imagine how much money is lost like that? (X depends on the training and sevral factors, but you know what I mean)
No, I am 100% positive that salary reductions will not represent a financial advantage to clubs with NT players. They will only reduce the financial disavantage, and hopefully make it at least bareble, otherwise the whole NT system will collapse.
Last edited by raonne at 4/12/2008 5:31:33 PM