manager of the NT (or better yet IS the maneger of the NT) of those players, one will This is all very interesting but it has nothing to do with the argument at hand. What I am saying is that if two managers have a player with the same skill, but one is friends with the be payed a certain salary by one manager, and the other will be payed much less by the other manager.I don't quite see the point. First, if there is one spot only available for this type of player, one of them will always be out of the team. Second, NT manager is an elected position. If the manager decides to use a strategy which weakens the team and profits some of his friends, well, the users in that country should have known better when they were voting.I don't see this as being much of a problem. The system has been implemented in other similar games and it works.
This is all very interesting but it has nothing to do with the argument at hand. What I am saying is that if two managers have a player with the same skill, but one is friends with the be payed a certain salary by one manager, and the other will be payed much less by the other manager.
What everyone should consider is that soon, a player will only be on the NT if he has legendary skills. He will have to be trained up to ages like 21 and 22.That's a huge disadvantage for the teams training them. The reality is that nobody will want to train players for NTs because they will be losing games and money, because of the unefficient training. Not to mention the astronomical salaries they will have to be paying, that they wouldn't have to if they stop training the old guys for the NT and trained new ones.So if there are no salary reductions the whole idea of the best players on the NTs goes down the drain. It simply won't work. Salary reductions are a necessity.