BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Official Second Team Poll & Discussion

Official Second Team Poll & Discussion (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: magiker

This Post:
22
254079.327 in reply to 254079.319
Date: 1/14/2014 12:57:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
199199
There are some ideas being floated around in here that will get lost, so if you have a different suggestion, post it in the Suggestions forum. This includes Utopias, colleges, women's leagues, etc. None of those will be happening if this change is implemented, so there's no need to mention your support of them in this thread. They are irrelevant distractions.
To be fair, the "utopia" suggestion is very similar to the idea being proposed. Instead of choosing a country of your choice for your second team, you're forced into a "BB Nation." All 11 restrictions that Marin outlined in his first post still apply, all the "pros" he listed in his second post still apply, and I believe it solves some of the "cons" as well. It's definitely not different enough to not warrant discussion. In fact, Marin even said "It's a valid proposition and should be considered in the conclusion." in this post ((254079.205)). I will agree on the youth league suggestions being irrelevant.

I keep hearing all these fears of rampant unchecked cheating. I honestly think this change would reduce cheating because BB would have mechanisms to prevent using the two teams in any combination effort.
I can not see how creating a second team could ever reduce cheating from the current game. Not increase it, maybe, but definitely won't reduce it.

But I am actually curious what exact cheating people think is going on now and how this proposal will add/subtract from it. Because other than occasionally seeing a team overpay for another team's players (which I have reported and seen both teams frozen shortly thereafter), I can't really envision what these fears are all about.
There are two factors that contribute to this. First, acquiring a second team in a country of your choice means you might be able to get in to a D2 in a micronation with a few bots. Leagues with constant turnover and lots of bots are pretty easy to sit in and bank some cash. And secondly, even though you have all this cash, what is your incentive to use it? You can't get to the B3, and is winning a micronation league title going to be a huge incentive? For some, sure. For others, probably not. So now you've got all this cash, you can't train your own country's NT players, and you're more interested in your first team winning, or your country's NT winning, than this second team. Here's some of the things you're allowed to do:

None of these are "cheating" per se, but they certainly wouldn't be considered "fair play." And I don't see any plausible restrictions to prevent them.

1. Bid up the players your D3 league mates are bidding on with your second team. You've got all this cash and care more about your first team. Are they going to implement a restriction that if anyone from your DIII.9 ever bids on a guy your second team isn't allowed to buy him? That seems harsh and kind of allows a team to "call dibs" on a guy so you can't buy him.
2. Spend all the money buying up another country's best prospects and not training them. Are they going to implement a restriction that forces you to train players? A coordinated effort by 3 people raking cash in micronations can make a big dent in a national team.
3. Smaller national teams rely on players that won't sell for 1mil. Second teams can just buy up these guys from other countries and fire them. No on buys them for 1mil, and they're retired.

A "BB-Nation" solves all of these issues.

Message deleted
This Post:
11
254079.330 in reply to 254079.5
Date: 1/14/2014 4:02:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
I agree since there is the chance to train young players better!

This Post:
00
254079.331 in reply to 254079.1
Date: 1/14/2014 5:00:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
The Second Team for Supporters should be more like the NBA's D-League Associate Team.

1. The D-League Associate Team could be used as a training ground/farm for players drafted by the Main Team
2. The Main Team can send any U21 players to the D-League Team for training.
3. Players above 21 y.o. can't be relegated to the D-League Team.
4. A player can be relegated/recalled to/from a D-League Team for a limited number of times per season (or there should be a cost for relegating a player to the D-League).
5. A player originally from the D-League Team (acquired through draft or free agency) can't be recalled to the main team.
6. If the manager wishes to use a player originally from the D-League Team in his Main Team, he has to acquire said player by paying the D-League Team a factor of the player's salary (example 10x the players salary). [Salary should be computed based on the skill, not the current posted salary]
7. The Main Team and the D-League Team maintains separate economies

I'm kinda busy right now but I got more ideas and I'll post them once I get more time. The above idea is still prone to some abuses so there should be more checks and balances to keep it from being abused.

This Post:
11
254079.333 in reply to 254079.302
Date: 1/14/2014 5:41:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
From my experience I can tell you I like many features the supporter package brings, but I couldn't single out one that would be the reason to buy supporter.

To explain myself better since my english is so-so: I like bookmarks, but would not buy supporter if it featured just bookmarks. Same for private leagues, buddy system, statistics etc. However, the sum of these features is appealing enough to me in order to buy supporter.

Maybe there are a considerable amount of users that are on the verge of buying supporter and the 2nd team feature would persuade them to do so.

Message deleted
From: Axis123

This Post:
00
254079.336 in reply to 254079.329
Date: 1/14/2014 6:57:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
I think you're underestimating the complexity (sometimes: viciousness) of transnational relations in some parts of the world here. Without wanting to accuse anyone of anything, think of the following sets of nations: Czech Republic-Slovakia; Bosnia-Croatia; Serbia-Montenegro; Norway-Sweden-Denmark; Finland-Estonia; Latvia-Lithuania; Russia-Belarus-Ukraine; Germany-Switzerland-Austria; Greece-Cyprus; Scotland-Wales-Ireland(-England); Turkey-Azerbaijan; USA-Canada; Malaysia-Singapore; China-Hongkong-Macau; Australia-New Zealand etc.etc. If you have some 10-20 supporters in a larger BB-community participating, such mutual NT-farming could be extremely effective.
Totes agree. +1

This Post:
00
254079.337 in reply to 254079.256
Date: 1/14/2014 6:57:43 AM
Ghost Masters
BLNO
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
Please don't do that, it's going to be like that - first team for playing, the second team for farming, if I had an opportunity to have the second team I would definitely be farming, not competing, especially if there is no opportunity to get into B3.


And you would be farming for whom ? You could not purchase norwegian players. And if you are training for a small country, good for that NT, but not all the people getting a second team would train just for a NT, most of them would try to compete.


That means that I would be more likely to be farming with my primary team, lets say I am competing in Spain's II division, huge competition, very little chances to promote, I register my second team, lets say, in Pakistan for better chances to play in top league and I am farming with my primary team in Spain because I can sell my players and buy good trainees, lvl 7 trainer and so on. So it's nevertheless encourages more farming.

Advertisement