BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Scrimmage Game Engine Feedback v2

Scrimmage Game Engine Feedback v2

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
87048.32 in reply to 87048.30
Date: 4/26/2009 12:40:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
but i would make defence a no brainer, when fcp is always the best strategy.


FCP won't always be the best strategy if players pay at least a minimum attention to handling/passing.

Climbing the BB-mountain. Destination: the top.
This Post:
00
87048.33 in reply to 87048.32
Date: 4/26/2009 1:12:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but i would make defence a no brainer, when fcp is always the best strategy.


FCP won't always be the best strategy if players pay at least a minimum attention to handling/passing.


even player with solid skill in this starts to make to en masse ;)

Ok maybe it could be succes then, just to train passing and handling team^^

The change should just change the game a bit, and don't make an entirely new game and punish people for past good decisiion.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 4/26/2009 1:12:59 PM

This Post:
00
87048.35 in reply to 87048.34
Date: 5/1/2009 4:30:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i still can't quite understand the rebounding. In the latest match it was more balanced and maybe someone else has a better example than this one (12722344).
But i still have the feeling, it's not really controlled by the stats of the players.
In this game his SF, PF and C would have matched or put up career highs (supporter feature) in rebounds! all against a better team. My team got "outrebounded" 68 to 60 in total.
His C is on the TL, so respectable was his stat in rebs (none of my players on SF, PF or C has a lower stat than this, even one of my SGs has strong rebounding).

Last edited by Lord^afk at 5/1/2009 4:31:49 AM

From: giona

This Post:
00
87048.36 in reply to 87048.35
Date: 5/1/2009 6:11:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
I don't have such precise data to report, but I arranged another scrimmage with a friend and I can say for sure that his players are actually worse than mine at rebounding... and for the second time I loose at rebounds (12723137)... not big difference overall, but lets' look at the detailed breakdown of rebounds: considering he played 2-3 zone I'd understand a low number of offensive rebounds for me... but he got too many offensive rebounds and his defense shouldn't help him in my defensive zone.

So I still don't understand the new rebounding system...

This Post:
00
87048.37 in reply to 87048.36
Date: 5/1/2009 1:11:28 PM
River Legends
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
12131213
I used for the friendly match just 3 players, to test a bit the rebounding tool.. i played 2-3 deffense, he went man to man. (12727724)

I played with a PG who has 6 in rebounding --> He got 2 rebounds.
I played with a SG who has 3 in rebounding --> He got 6 rebounds.
I played with a Lucky Fan as SF --> He got 9 rebounds.
I played with a Lucky Fan as PF --> He got 16 rebounds.
I played with a Center who has 6 in rebounding --> He got 24 rebounds.

I had 57 rebounds (16 offensive) and the other team had 62 (17 offensive).

He used better rebounders (i played also with a pair of Lucky Fans as 3 and 4), and he got nearly the double in the reboundings ratings, 3(low) vs 4 (high). But we nearly had the same rebounds. Instead, the position that i thought that i was wining (my PG has 6 in rebounding) is the position that just got 2 rebounds.

From: ferry
This Post:
00
87048.38 in reply to 87048.37
Date: 5/1/2009 6:34:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Has this engine been activated for provate league games?

This Post:
00
87048.40 in reply to 87048.37
Date: 5/6/2009 9:55:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
What did you expect?

This Post:
00
87048.41 in reply to 87048.40
Date: 5/6/2009 11:37:24 AM
River Legends
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
12131213
I expected a relation between the skill of rebounding and the rebounds that each player got. And also a huge advantage for the other team in the total rebounds, as i played with a lucky fan as SF, a lucky fan as PF and a 6 rebounding center.

He used those players as PF and C: (8011270), 39 mins as Center, (7472256), 30 minutes as PF and (8459860) as a backup PF and C (4 in rebounding), i suppose that the others have at least 5-6+

He also used this guys as SF: (8842696) and (5172323), i dont know their skills, but seeing the match ratings i suppose that they had much more rebounding skill that my lucky fans.

Last edited by LeYeNdiNhA at 5/6/2009 11:38:56 AM

This Post:
00
87048.42 in reply to 87048.41
Date: 5/6/2009 11:54:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Well, I wouldn't expect wonders from PG with reb 6 (on PG position). It looks like rebounds are distributed towards positions (to both players so that would explain why lucky fan PF got some albeit the better rebounder of the two got more of course) based on height of the skill of both players at that postition
(or based on height of the skill of the better one or something like that) and based on position of course. It is just a theory I guess it worked this way before too, maybe it has more impact now.

Advertisement