I apologise if you thought I was upset with your lack of presence recently. I was actually referring to the thread in general rather than you specifically. If you or I aren't posting, it seems silent. This doesn't bode well, in my opinion, for having managers assist in completing this PU version of a HG League. This is why I have put the whole Private League question out there.
Thank you for your consideration - I didn't thought you were upset with me, I just were surprised of the change of focus in discussion (towards the private league). But you nailed your point - if neither us have been sending messages, it has been more or less silent, of which I've raised my "concerns" already before. Which of course leads to another challenge of PU league and it's commissioner/staff - if people are not willing to post much on the forum, I'm not sure how many/how much anyone would be interested in helping with the administrative (commissioner) duties.
Like I mentioned before, in terms of the homegrown league that we have planned:
A) I wouldn't expect "regular" BBHG league managers to take over staff duties (if no other way, and if you, MrJ, don't have time/energy to take over some duties, then I suppose I'll see during the first season if it proves to be too much work - I don't like to give up easily either but there's limit for all),
B) I don't have experience on running such league, so I couldn't tell if it's doable alone/by two managers in terms of work load in the long run
C) I wouldn't mind if BBHG would become official part of BB, but owners haven't commented on this forum
D) Private league will never be able to replace this league I suggested, by being free to all. In terms of everything else than fixed (?) league system it's a lot more low maintenance than Pickup game league (BBHG) like you mentioned.
I must say that I understand where you are coming from in everything you have noted. However, I am not sure whether I have the energy to continue working through the PickUp system knowing that it will always be reliant on a couple of managers to orchestrate everything, while relying on all participating managers to do their part with pickup tokens (the core of the system) and, as such, is prone to mistakes and failure.
As it stands right now I am torn. On the one hand I want to continue what I have started in helping you and others create the PU version of the HGL simply because I don't like to quit and it would provide a 'free' league for all; yet, on the other hand, I really like the low-maintenance a PL provides, which is already familiar, organised and ready-to-go.
I totally get that. Like I mentioned before, if I'd have enough money, I'd just buy everyone supporter package instead and do it as a private league. But, and this is a very important point, as long as not everyone willing (and qualified) to participate aren't able to participate due to not being supporter, I would't dare to call myself a champ playing in such league; it'd be an invitational/pay to participate-league for the ones willing to throw in the cash. A total no-no for me. Just as would be 2 same leagues competing with each other (PL and PU simultaneously).
I do read your message somewhat in between the lines too, and of course agree that low-maintenance part (probably even more so after likely being a commissioner for whole season), and I kind of sense that you use word "free" due to time not being free, and time consuming it surely can be.
So I think I understand with what you mean by being torn. I'm not torn though, as this seems only way to get it done. I am, however, worried that if you do decide to withdraw your contribution towards the league, that how much work it will become for one person. But I guess only time would tell, and if we create good enough systems for everything (certain rules, certain methods for sending box scores of games etc.) maybe it'll still remain reasonably manageable.