Say the same thing to the GMs who accused me of flaming, when I know very well there wasn't any, then I won't be disappointed. However, I know you're not going to do that because GMs can accuse people of anything they like. Its only when people defend themselves from one GM after another that people are told to shut up.
The word flame has appeared (outside of this side conversation between me and you) exactly once in a post by any GM or EGM, and that was from GM-Nik0:
Just imagine for a second that most of the people here are wrong and the user was rightfully banned. And instead of doing his job catching cheaters, some of our most experienced GMs (Perpete, Nick, Manon) spend his time participating in a flame war here. Is this your idea about "next top priority"?
I had a nice, mildly sarcastic comment after this but it serves no constructive purpose, so I won't make it. I will just point out that I definitely don't see any evidence of you being accused of flaming by multiple GMs, as your post asserts, nor do I recall (though I haven't gone back through the posts again) about people being told to "shut up." If GMs are accusing people of anything they like, I think I've already mentioned the proper procedure to report that.
Please note that the above was not intended to be an accusation of any sort, and I tried very hard to speak strictly to the facts and leave personal opinions out of things. If you've seen me post much on the forums, you know that should be considered an accomplishment. I would encourage anyone else to try to do the same, as facts and opinions are very different things that share one common quality: no amount of persuasion can change either.