BuzzerBeater Forums

I think the breakdown is that if you take a guy with high IS/REB/ID/SB he will be pretty astronomical on the salary scale, you have to save somewhere in order to prop up elsewhere, Id assume thats why most people dont train SB, they want the guy to rebound, where I would rather ride my Defense and hope for a team effort in rebounding

Surely 2.4 Blocks in D1 is not the equivalent of 2.4 blocks in D4 or D3 or even D2 for that matter,

Isn't it the same for RB? I'm not talking about SB in a vacuum, I'm talking RB vs SB and how relatively high levels of both produce different kind of results compared to other players.

Basically I'm saying thaat 14 RB might be more effective in getting good rbds/game numbers than 14 SB will get you blocks/game

Last edited by Lemonshine at 4/7/2016 3:42:53 AM

Yes, that is true. I however dont think that the impact of SB can be measured solely in blocks on the stat sheet. I think it helps the player play defense period, defend shots and not foul.

I dont take part in the forum discussion much, so forgive me if i have missed your previous analysis. For me i have gone SB > ID mostly to see what it can do as it is a vastly unused skill, and I have enjoyed my results so far. If Marin has confirmed that SB = ID is best practice why is this not public knowledge and why are peoples views on SB so jaded?? I would bet 95% of managers dont ever train SB.

The only part i have a hard time believing is that the Game Engine is that in depth. Personally, I think it is much simpler then they want us to believe, Theres only a few Skill's, Its basketball and has 1 clear way to win. Being someone who dabbles in creating simulations for fun I just dont see any real depth to the engine outside of, pick who shoots, > is he better then defender > x chance to make it > result > next play.

Haek is a very interesting player, Id like to create a guy with 20s in OD/ID/SB just to see how he plays.
What are his defensive splits?

Well, there is the fact that SB trains much faster so it makes sense to do that before ID, but yeah I agree that ID=SB works best on big men, I did follow the discussions and went that way too.

I'm not convinced about SB on guards though, but I suppose the whole premise here was that it might help on the driving opponents in LI. If that's the case though, it would be cheaper and easier to run zone defenses (with high SB on the bigs) like some managers have tried in the past. It surely is a lot easier than having both guards and SF with high SB. And let's be honest: Mordor's Chaperon had 20 IS and no matter how much you train SB, you will never have anywhere near 20 SB on a guard.

I've been training almost all my seasons in the game(plus all the seasons in Utopia).
This season is the first ever i gave JR training.
I was SHOCKED to see my 24y old, 6'7" trainee, getting THREE pop ups in FOUR JR sessions, with two OD sessions in between.
That is a confirmed >0,50 in JR, per session, at 24y and at SF height!!!!!

If it's way behind the other skills, it can be quick. The elastic effect appears very heavy on JR - I have a level 6 trainer and my 20 year old 6'1" guy took 5 weeks of full training to go from 16 to 17 JR.

I forgot to mention, i have level 4 trainer in that guy's team.
His JR was one below JS before the first pop up, two up now.
It was 8 below OD though.
I am certain it's got something to do with the elastic effect too, but that much?

p.s 20year old, 17JR...and his daughter's name is Riley by any chance?

Everyone, IMO, errors in the way of punting JR and SB for sooo long.... and they are lower salary cost, free in some formulas.

Cap formulas are actually very clear. JR takes (used to take) more cap than any other outside skill for Cs, about 5 times more than PA and JS is the second highest (and usually the main culprit about gimped Cs salary-wise or skill-wise) about 3 times more than PA.

JR had a higher Cap weight than OD for SG. JR had nearly the same Cap weight than OD and higher than IS and ID for SFs.


Last edited by Lemonshine at 4/8/2016 5:19:14 AM