BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Season 8 Changes

Season 8 Changes

Set priority
Show messages by
From: artryx
This Post:
00
72142.227 in reply to 72142.226
Date: 2/27/2009 12:50:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I didn't read everything.

In regards to taxes on foreign players, how about we group by region? Japanese managers wouldn't have to pay tax for Chinese, Korean players etc. Canada grouped with US, Mexico.

This Post:
00
72142.228 in reply to 72142.226
Date: 2/27/2009 1:10:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
I have not looked at the Spanish or Thai teams, however I would guess that the reason for having domestic players is the same as in Sweden, namely the teams are pretty inactive abd are still playing mostly with their original, i.e. domestic, players.

If you take a look at their transfer history instead I am sure that you will see that once they buy new players they are generally foreign players, simply because it is so hard to find domestic players. I am sure that complicating the transfer for those teams will only result in alienating them even more from the transfer, thus resulting in fewer avtive teams.

This Post:
00
72142.229 in reply to 72142.228
Date: 2/27/2009 1:57:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Your first point sounds about right for Thailand.

I do not think it is difficult to find Spanish players on the market. There are 772 players with role player or lower potential available at the moment, and 125 players with MVP or higher. I also assume that div. 2.in Spain is mostly full of competitive teams.

Also, now it is easier to find domestic players than it was even last week. It might at some point (two seasons down the road) be more difficult to buy them becasue of local competition but I just don't believe that a 10% wage decrease for having a domestic player or 10% wage increase for having a foreign player is going to change people's minds about whether or not to use the TL.
Also in your post about Hoop Hoop Hooray, what if the domestic players are discounted? Then he saves $9000/wk. which is $126000 for the season, which is enough to build 603 bleachers.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
From: brian

This Post:
00
72142.230 in reply to 72142.227
Date: 2/27/2009 3:59:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Actually thats a pretty good idea. Could even have a credit by region and then a higher credit for home grown players.

Last edited by brian at 2/27/2009 4:01:45 AM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
72142.231 in reply to 72142.229
Date: 2/27/2009 4:40:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
I have not posted about HHH, I believe that Jokehim did. However it is not really important at all if HHH, or any other team, saves or looses money depending on if it is a discount or a tax. As you are compeeting against other teams that have the same conditions as you the effect is just some "deflation"/"inflation". The interesting thing is if it adds some fun or not for most teams, as -obviously- in the long run most people who have fun tend to play the game longer than those that find it boring.

Anyway, I do not think that a 10-20% (which is the proposal and not "10%") will have a big impact on people staying away from the TL, however I am certain that it will have some negative impact as the only thing it does for most teams is to complicate the transfer without added value/fun.

This Post:
00
72142.232 in reply to 72142.229
Date: 2/27/2009 4:49:29 AM
Jokehim Maniacs
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
188188
Second Team:
Jokehim Maniacs II
I posted about HHH. I think that it is much more complicated than just comparing salaries with arena income. Don't forget that to stay competible you need a strong team, i.e. you must buy new players, and that you also need to pay money for the staff (my cost is almost $60000 week there without having highest level). The economy is much more complicated than I described and right now I think that most teams have a big difficulty to stay strong and also avoid a negative balance on a weekly basis.

This Post:
00
72142.233 in reply to 72142.231
Date: 2/27/2009 5:14:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191

..... I am certain that it will have some negative impact as the only thing it does for most teams is to complicate the transfer without added value/fun.


Perhaps added strategy? I think this will benefit those willing to be diligent on the TL, and be a detriment to those who are not. Extra effort reaps rewards :)

This Post:
00
72142.234 in reply to 72142.226
Date: 2/27/2009 6:42:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Well we don't know what is going to happen, exactly. I agree with you that it would be better if this were the case. It would also help average teams in smaller countries who don't have a lot of foreign players, of which there are many many many teams. I checked around in Spain's second divisions, in Italy's second divisions and there are lots of teams with over 50% domestic players. In Thailand, there are only five or six teams that have even 1 foreign player, so if it is a reduction in salary for domestic players, the teams behind the division leaders will be helped out a lot.

Yes,I agree with you,also because the salaries will rise so much in the future with the players with high potential,so if we create new difficulties it will be a problem.This kind of solution for who have homegrown players help so much about this aspect :D

This Post:
00
72142.235 in reply to 72142.233
Date: 2/27/2009 7:00:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080

..... I am certain that it will have some negative impact as the only thing it does for most teams is to complicate the transfer without added value/fun.


Perhaps added strategy? I think this will benefit those willing to be diligent on the TL, and be a detriment to those who are not. Extra effort reaps rewards

Yes, it could be seen as a mean for added strategy. However, the strategy in itself is obvious, buy domestic players if possible becuse they are cheaper, thus in the end it is more about who has the will and the patience to sit on the TL rather than who comes up with the best strategy.

This Post:
00
72142.236 in reply to 72142.231
Date: 2/27/2009 7:26:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Sorry to confuse you with Jokehim...

I see your point and I guess I agree, although it certainly wouldn't hurt my fun. I am of the opinion that if the game is too easy it's fun quotient diminshes. But, as I have said, I am not the target audience for the developers. And, as my first post in this thread said, we don't really have any clue what form the change will come in. I have been happy with the changes made to game so far in my 5+ seasons of playing, so I'm going to remain optimistic.

And, Jokehim, sorry to confuse you with Chespirito.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
72142.237 in reply to 72142.236
Date: 2/27/2009 8:45:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
Sorry to confuse you with Jokehim...

Ok, for this time, but dont make it again. Who would like to be mixed up with Jokehim? ;)

I see your point and I guess I agree, although it certainly wouldn't hurt my fun. I am of the opinion that if the game is too easy it's fun quotient diminshes. But, as I have said, I am not the target audience for the developers. And, as my first post in this thread said, we don't really have any clue what form the change will come in. I have been happy with the changes made to game so far in my 5+ seasons of playing, so I'm going to remain optimistic.

I would also want more strategy and "complexity", but that does not need to come with negative side effects like this would. The reason why you are not doing the optimal thing should be that you dont master it, not that you think it is boring work (as many would with putting more focus on the transfer).

Advertisement