BuzzerBeater Forums

So change it. Possibility to enlarge the arena in any time of season is totally unrealistic and it isn't compulsory to have that possibility. THEN change it into possibility to rebuild it only in some let's say three weeks between seasons.

Everything in a game cannot be realistic, however, it should be as much realistic as possible. Poeple want realism in games. We don't live in 80's. And if there is a possibility to put a sponsor factor into the BB, it should be done. It complicates the game - sure; it makes it harder to the newbies - sure. But wait a second? Life is easy? Being a manager is easy? Playing a new game is supposed to be easy? NO!

Talking about the coach issue.

"there is a need of raising you staff salary or there would be no need to change them ever again after you buy one"

Some trainers work in real teams for more than ten years. I mean, basketball teams. In football it goes even further than "more than ten years". But okay! Trainers should be changed to make the game harder, but not just for that. Trainers in real world don't become more expensive with every week, but they become leff effective. Because of lots of reasons. They're bored of the city, the team, players etc. What THAT has in common with the EVERY WEEK payrise? It was okay before, staff were becoming weaker, just as in real life. It wasn't perfect, because they could get weaker in the middle of the season, but better. Closer to reality. Now we have some total fantasy.

Again - sponsors: YES.

Sponsors - no

They add nothing to the basketball part of the game. They merely increase the complexity of managing the franchise's accounts. It's an economic feature for features' sake.

They add nothing to the basketball part of the game.

yeah, but, isn't BB a basketball management game?

IMO, sponsors should be added here... because it add up to the reality of being able to manage a successful BB team.

They add nothing to the basketball part of the game.

yeah, but, isn't BB a basketball management game?

IMO, sponsors should be added here... because it add up to the reality of being able to manage a successful BB team.

I agree with el macca - this is a change for the sake of change, and doesn't really add any true substance to the game, and would unnecessarily complicate the game, especially for newer users.

I can think of many things that would be more fruitful for the development team to work on.

you mean this suggestion doesn't even qualify to be put on the suggestion "wish-list"?

What do you mean?

I mean does this suggestion can't be possible to be added here in BB? opinion-wise... of course.

I'm not the one that decides what gets added and what doesn't.

I'd be really surprised if it did, but it's not 0%

I'm not the one that decides what gets added and what doesn't.

yep, i get that... i just wanna know how can't this be possible for some...

for me, adding up sponsors can be additional source of resource for the team... maybe it would help the merchandise income, but not totally replacing it.

and it's as easy as picking up what's the good sponsor for the team... the span could be monthly... or even for one season...

also, i played in other management games, and picking up sponsors is present... it may not be efficient basketball-wise due to some reasons, but in the management point of view, it is essential.

also, this could be another way for new users to level up with the top class clubs here in BB

I also play many other management games, and I challenge the idea that it is essential. As far as I'm concerned it's just an annoying feature that adds little to the sport of football, cricket, athletics etc.

It's just a marketing issue. I prefer merchandising, is that is a better correlation to the idea of a sports franchise (i.e how many fans love the team enough to buy the replica shirt). I couldn't give a ...damn... which corporate marketing budget has its name on the teamshirt.

Last edited by Elmacca at 1/21/2009 5:44:29 PM