hmm, i thought i have explianed this in my post above, but i can tell it once again, simplified it is just this fact, that you won't win a game although your team makes 150 points, if the opponent scores 170
of course you have to choose the best player, so i never would take a player with
js 7 jr 7
od 18 handl 7
drive 7 pass 7
if you could have one with
js 14 jr 12
od 12 handl 10
drive 10 pass 10
even though the od is much higher, only if i have to decide, if I want a player with one more skill in range or a player with one more skill in outside defense, i would decide for the player with the higher defense
in addition to that, i like high role players, in case i decide for a run and gun offense my center should have a lot rebound and inside defense, but the inside shot wouldn't be that important, because the center has just the function to defend and win the rebound, for the guards this would have the effect, that they have to throw better as if i play look inside, but they passing skill isn't that important, because the ball doesn't have to get into the zone, they have to throw from downtown
I hope you understand what I mean
it gets really clear, if you look at the position of the small forward, you will have two complet different players for each tactic on the court
it would be optimal if I had three different, but equipollent players in my roster, one for outside and one for inside tactics and one balanced skilled player, often unfortunately this is not the case, because you've got one everyone topping player in your roster, who has to play for every single tactic :-)