BuzzerBeater Forums

Does it matter to be honest?.

Yes

You rather keep them losing in the playoffs and dominating the regular season throughout the leagues 20+ wins every season, gaining mass income season after season.

No. I would rather them learn how to win the playoffs. Also, there is more revenue from promoting. Get your facts right.

And who should demote to give extra spots then? Teams who not only earned their spot and also did enough to keep it?

Less than a season ago the OP didn't even know how to manage enthusiasm. He is still learning the game and getting smashed twice a week won't teach him anything he can't learn where he is.

Me and Lambini had a very interesting strategy for my 2nd final appearance and lost in the finals. I am still trying to figure it out myself and I been here for 21 seasons now.

We won the rebounding battle against California and it was a part of a scheme since my guessing is that California runs multiple tactics every game.

I have no issue with the system of demotion or promotion. I said, A strong 20+ win team should promote for the sake of league fairness and economic fairness, to punish a manager for his opponent in front of him is silliness. He/she has no control of that. A league championship only shouldn't be the only up to increase competition.

Last edited by john otters at 7/21/2018 12:54:41 AM

A league championship only shouldn't be the only up to increase competition.

It's not.

Then why debate my point? When you know isn't? You have also devalued your own point for the sake of a argument which was not needed. Imjs.

No one has to be 100% factually correct in assertion nor than they be in game like this with so much to learn, unknown. Most only know in assertion or trail and error but still its not pure fact, but only a morally based fact. Based on the rule guide , teams with 20+ win auto promote based on strength of team. Your debate is strength of league.

Now it can be mix of both, Which I do think it is.

I feel teams than have 20+ win over 3 seasons need to be promoted. You may argue promotion bring more money. My counter is his ticket prices sells wills still be better than a new comer or stagnant league teams,because he is stronger team in the league, with better players to boot. Winning games bring revenue. To keep them there winning creates economic imbalance. Maybe not on purpose by the managers.. Finances and revenue are real and need discussed a such. No team league economic structure, team by team is the same. Why talk about it like they are. Promotion money does nothing in a stronger leagues beside go to arena seats, if they are not to the higher league standards, which creates a debt.

Last edited by john otters at 7/22/2018 5:20:39 PM

We won the rebounding battle against California and it was a part of a scheme since my guessing is that California runs multiple tactics every game.

I like how you refer to me as California like no one else has that in their name. Quakes would likely be the better way to call my team.

Anyways, like all points made on the forums, you missed his point entirely. I would explain what he meant, but I would be wasting my time.