BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Modify how injuries occur

Modify how injuries occur

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
194523.19 in reply to 194523.18
Date: 8/22/2011 8:28:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
its still a foul. might not have been flagrant and might not have been shooting, but its still a foul.

and as i said, I personally have never seen one of these. but ive seen plenty of shooting-flagrant foul combo's as most people would agree, so if there is the existence of non-flagrant foul -injuries, then their occurance is so minimal that Im suggesting it should be changed to be more frequent, and reduce the frequency of foul-related injuries.



This Post:
00
194523.25 in reply to 194523.23
Date: 8/25/2011 2:16:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
as a blanket rule, having a top level doctor = less/zero injuries

But thats not what this thread is about, its about a suggestion to simply modify the way that injuries occur in-game.

sorry im being a thread-nazi, a previous thread about this got hijacked (probably by me ha!) so im just policing this one.

*beeeeeeewwwwwwwwww* <------ thats my siren.

This Post:
11
194523.26 in reply to 194523.25
Date: 8/26/2011 9:22:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
I generally float between a level 5 and a level 3 doctor depending on how my finances are going at the time I need to replace them but I cannot see any pattern at all in the number or severity of the injuries.

I was 5 points off making the ABBL two seasons ago, improved my team a great deal but was not even close last season as two of my top three players spent several weeks out injured and one key sub was worthless for 90% of the season due to injuries. Injuries happen, they are a realistic part of basketball and they are a lot milder here than in real life or in other games like NBA live where you can have guys injured for 40 weeks.

So I have been crippled by injuries, twice in my BB career, and I say they are good they way they are providing a good random factor in a game that could be too predictable otherwise.

This Post:
00
194523.27 in reply to 194523.16
Date: 8/27/2011 12:49:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
12001200
Yes correct, at the moment its shooting foul + flagrant foul combo. I have never seen a non-shooting non-flagrant foul occur ever.

This is the first (and only) injury of my season http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/36489490/reportmatch.aspx?realTime=990
Non-flagrant foul.
Actually my experience is totally different, I've seen more non-flagrant foul leading to an injury, rather than flagrant-foul-combo.

This Post:
00
194523.28 in reply to 194523.27
Date: 8/27/2011 9:35:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
yer i have to admit, i think the BB gods set me up for failure here, last game i watched, a non-flagarnt foul caused an injury.
So i stand corrected!


Still, it was a foul, and the basis of the suggestion is to have non-foul related injuries. :)




Advertisement