BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > SF

SF

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
147837.18 in reply to 147837.17
Date: 6/24/2010 3:03:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I was thinking of playing him as a SF, how about that? As BB states his role as SF too.

This Post:
00
147837.21 in reply to 147837.16
Date: 6/24/2010 5:19:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
No, he is not a good SG in motion, as they need passing, possible more than JS (well, close anyway). Play motion when you have a PG type playing at SG.


While I'd admit I like passing for Motion, I would also say that this is taking it a bit too far. SG for motion should be first and foremost a SG...not PG.

This Post:
00
147837.22 in reply to 147837.21
Date: 6/25/2010 9:52:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Why are you discussing a SG in a SF thread?

This Post:
00
147837.23 in reply to 147837.22
Date: 6/25/2010 9:58:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
It was a response to broncoWI's statement that SG for Motion needs as much PS as JS.


This Post:
00
147837.24 in reply to 147837.21
Date: 6/25/2010 1:21:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Perhaps I was overdoing it a little for emphasis, but from CoachParrot, of a SGs contribution to outside scoring in a motion offense, .09 comes from JS, while .10 comes from PS. So from a team ratings perspective, passing is more important than jump shot. Compare this to RnG, where .15 comes from JS, and .01 from PS. While team ratings certainly are not actual performance, since I seem to remember hearing that team ratings are still calculated for the old game engine, this is why I would look for a hybrid PG/SG to play at the SG in motion. Of course, I still would obviously want someone who was better as a SG than as a PG to allow me to run other tactics.