BuzzerBeater Forums

It wouldn't become per say faster over all as in Ge, At the same ,the players become better faster which create faster planning of player building, thus faster movement within teams in the training and future player expectations.

This also helps team create revenue, which I think the biggest point or reason for this methods nobody is willing to say or point out. I see nothing wrong with that.

Well that's not really true. Height and starting skills would influence price.
As far as I can see HT is without potential (correct me if I'm.wrong) so perhaps someone could say how things work there and here in comparison.

Yes, excluding the youth academy which had a mechanic similar to potential, in Hattrick there are no potential limits. The practical result is that the lucky lottery ticket is a 17y 0d player with great starting skills, rather than an 18 yo draftee with great potential and good starting skills.

Question : Are we going back to a time where the 3/2 defense is the best one and bit inside offense tactic?
Recently i have seen a lot of games with funny 3/2 defense agaisnt Inside attack and win easily. Should not be the case.

If it worked because of something else, presumably that something would be effective with a 2-3, box and 1, or mtm defensive tactic too shouldn't it?

Last edited by Lemonshine at 12/10/2014 9:30:32 AM

I don't know. I really have the feeling that 3/2 defense is the bebst way to defend at the moment... agaisnt every type of tactique...

Well, they made no major change to the game except SB...

If the SB change made 3-2 zone trump all over the rest of the defensive tactics, I agree with Trainerman that something is really wrong for a basketball simulation. In the real world it makes very little sense to play a 3-2 zone to defend a team which scores mostly in the paint

yes.. but man to man is still stronger.. all need in 3-2 zone is a very good sf. or play 4 guards. the defense will do the rest.

that what we are seeing. sf/pf build like guards than can defend with sb.. it expensive a same cost effective long term.


If we switch the 3-2 formula to 2-3 it should work as well. Only difference is you put 2 paitent shooting built pf in with good defense pf /c . It should work. the other 3 are sf built guards with sb and defense.

It not as expensive as it sound. Actually its cost effective.

that would depend on sf defensive ability. if the team trys to get inside. the lane are shut down. driving lead to block shots.

If the opposing team pf/c have good id and sb also the sf. what can the home inside team do. The pf and center have no jumper. the guards cant pass inside or shoot they are well defended.



inside tactics are for driving and paint play. all the offense point production is on the big men shoulder to score and maybe the sg sometime depending on how he is built.. with hybrid guards and dynamic sf and pf being made now. Li is not going to win like it use to. Unless you have a really, really powerful version of it.

the LI guards builds are too weak compared to how a 3-2 guard defenders has to be built, that also play huge roll in the offensive side because of their said builds. cut cooker Li built work sometimes at the same you need an expert Li build to be very effective , I still do think Li is way to strong through.

That my opinion. not a fact



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 12/10/2014 8:35:05 PM