BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 2-3 zone vs m2m

2-3 zone vs m2m

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
145907.16 in reply to 145907.15
Date: 6/7/2010 5:23:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Well I wasnt just asking because of our 1 game, I'm going to be playing teams like gavno or bangerz in the playoffs who are strong inside and decent outside so I wanted input for a better understanding of how the tactics work in the game engine.

You said all 5 startest and bench players have good driving and passing so 3-2 makes it easier for you, but that would actually be a support for a 3-2 zone so i can cover the drive and prevent the passes better.

Thanks for input everyone especially naker virus

This Post:
00
145907.17 in reply to 145907.16
Date: 6/7/2010 6:01:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
Of course it does, the trade off however is more rebounds for myself, more touches and quality shots for my big men. Pretty fine by me. I get tired of constant double teams in the post anyway.

Gavno has been Run and Gun this year, not sure about 2-3, although it'd probably work vs Bangers.

This Post:
00
145907.18 in reply to 145907.17
Date: 6/7/2010 7:21:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
well the point would be less touches for your big men not more. obviously rebounding, and the quality of the shot when they do toch the ball would be increased

I think even if i went 1-3-1 zone i would still win the game so im not too worried even if things dont work out

Last edited by russell123 at 6/7/2010 7:21:37 PM

This Post:
00
145907.19 in reply to 145907.18
Date: 6/7/2010 11:37:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
Slightly less touches, way better chance at scoring. M2M would be a way better idea.

This Post:
00
145907.20 in reply to 145907.19
Date: 6/8/2010 12:16:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
I'll probably end up going 2-3 zone just to keep up my PD, i dont want gavno coming back with any huge wins