BuzzerBeater Forums

couse i haven´t read what he said.

I still think that the increase of salaries is a bad idea.

Ok sweet thanks!

Really, now can happen many thinks about, the real question have to be focus at the end of the season. With the money that the winners teams receive, when they go to the top league, What players they will have to buy to competitive? who is watching this?

Now you need twice money to buy what you bought last season. Will be bis diference beetwen teams went to top league than the teams will go this season.

You buy at twice it's price... you sell at twice his price...

easy

Except that when you promote you are the underdog, and the bonus you recieve to catch up with the other teams suddenly have becomme reduced to half what it was worth before, relative to the market. I think this was the point of the previous message(?).

On a side note I don't think the prices would stay this high forever, but if they do, the promotion price should be revised. (even if it means more money into the economy). No, wait, I'm not sure about this one...

Last edited by Svett Sleik (U21-Scout Norge) at 10/26/2009 3:43:34 AM

so if you add more money to the game and you don't expect prices becoming higher?

7 weeks until the final of the seasson... 7 weeks for the transfermarket to slow ...

i see no point into put more money into the game even if it means this season promotes are recibing a little less money compared to trnsferlist pries... but hell the promotion prices are relately news to the game... few seasons ago they weren't and all the teams promoted before never seem a dime for theis promotions...

Don't think on toda think on tomorrow and if this is a 1 season theme don't made changes that will efect longer than that. By the way.

Not only player have higher prices, go to see coach lvl 6 or 7 ...

Its the cup money that makes no sense now.... when allstar week comes about then you effectively have 1 week of earning precious little... as the average team salary increases it belittles the efforts of anyone in the cup...

The rating on the cup run in the fan survey might have as much financial impact as the actual cup bonus. It's a pretty small piece of the revenue pie for higher division teams, but you also get to tie the majority of games early on.

Few little things add up I guess.

Last edited by brian at 10/27/2009 11:11:03 AM

Heya

I'd like to write a quick note here about the current inflation and our "National Bank (BB) not suppling enough offer for the demand". (i know, normally National banks can only control liquidity and not production)

Why are there only about 4-5 "useful" FA's (Guards) this week if there are at least 50+ (i have no clue, i just know of about 3-4 teams in my closer environment) sitting on 4-5mio+ cash. (Useful = 40k+ balanced salary players)

I do not think it's correct needing to pay 5-6mio for a player that used to be worth 1.8-2.5mio. Yes.. i am talking about ordinary 9-10 skill guards (average like 9.5 on the 6 skills) selling for 4mio+, which is an absolute joke. Moreover it gets even more ugly, when you sold players 3-4 weeks ago and now need to buy players, but can't even afford a slightest upgrade, even if you add another million on top of what you got for your sold player.

Oh and just to clarify. This isn't a whine post. I study economics since 4 years and also have some knowledge about inflation and monetary policy.

Since i do not want to complain without offering a solution, i'll also write what i think would help a lot.

I think adding another 4-5 highly skilled players for every position (average 12-13 for the important skills ~40k+ salary) & 4-5 medium skilled (average 9-10 skills, ~20-40k salary) every week for the next couple of weeks would help reducing the liquidity in the market. Managers with lots of money can spend their 6-7mio on the highly skilled players and the ones with 2-4mio can get their 30k players and things should balanced the market down a bit within 3-4 weeks. Of course we will not see the same prices we saw 5-6 weeks ago, but normalizing things a bit would definitely not harm.

I also think it would be more than fair to have some interest on banked money. 0.125% would already be major - but i guess we're far from that..?

Any thoughts and feedbacks?

Last edited by shades236 at 11/2/2009 7:48:02 AM