donc ce n'est pas plus intéressant d'essayer de d'abord atteindre l'équivalence par rapport à la répartitions optimale?
eg:
start 5438 500 60 2
ideal final 15000 5000 500 50
ideal now 5438 1813 181 18
et il me semblait que les gradins les plus chers étaient justement les moins volatiles
You will find that the people who want the most expensive seats will pay their money win or lose (but care a lot about ticket prices), while the less expensive seats are mostly filled by rabid fans who will show up when the team is winning but won't pay to see a losing team.
Last edited by Ratun at 10/19/2022 2:39:14 AM