BuzzerBeater Forums

Not the point of there's 22 games in a season . Its the fact you can do that and tank without any penalty.. They can sit on 10-10 or 12-10 every season and make the league playoffs and still be tanking still be making mass revenue.

Leagues are based on strength some stronger than the next. Some manager walked from v- 2 league or top no issues never changed their team true core. You call him a genius , you call him knowing, your going to listen to him without a doubt. His merits are so much stronger. why because league strength was in his favor he was never a guru like some make them be.

Some managers didn't have that luxury of weak league after weak league, they got stuck here, and there. But you call them idiots. You call them not knowing because they don't the same merits as this guy I mentioned above.. In my mind I think you should sit back and see that point to moots

In my mind the second managers is 100 times better than the 1st one. and has the merits, His words are golden to me . But you wouldn't know this your to stuck on status quo rather than hard work dedication in the craft. Nothing is honest or fair in basketball.. Look the Miami heat(nba) went to 4 straight championship and pulled a kid , off the national ncaa championship team . One of best pg in the country one top college teams in the country. They didn't tank but in bb is not possible; so much for the realism argument.

Now seattle/okc thunder tanked in the past. Got good player for that. the charolette hornet/bobcat tanked they're a playoff team today the spurs tanked champions team through the draft all of the,.. All cost should manage correctly. I don't agree with the restrictions all time. I think nothing gis fair in sports or on BB. Inject some fun it the game to start, some success early. Level of play and learning curve etc will always be there. Remember this for fun to start. Yes money is being spent and being made but at same it made for fun. Restricts and hinders, take aways drastic change. Kill that fun.

I think BB should working on fun to start for new managers. Help them to start so they can support to continue that fun and success, Natural tanking is just part of that learning curve. My points

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 11/30/2014 11:39:04 AM

Its the fact you don't want know or care to know, . Real recognize Real.

I spoke on real things in BB, you don't care. Because it not real to you. The game is dying because all these restricts, hinders. When is BB going help a team to start, rather give them a unworldly struggle.. Give them fun to start and success. So they can support BB to keep that fun and success going.. Do you understand?? Or are your morning glass broken?



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 11/30/2014 11:49:18 AM

Why give them [brand new managers] low potential players to start[?] … When is BB going help a team to start, rather give them a unworldly struggle[?] Give them fun to start and success.

I think the answer is obvious. Many “experienced” managers, too lazy or dumb to compete, would simply abandon their old teams to get success handed to them with a new team. Complete chaos and anarchy. New managers can and do succeed as it is; it is NOT the impossible task you portray.

At any rate, it looks like you all believe forums to be important (so do I): is there any plan to reshape the forums somehow, to make them more appealing/easier to access? I know they work as they are, they are just not the most appealing/user friendly I've seen in games of this kind.

That is an understatement, like saying the Earth is a little bit large. Improving the forums may well merit consideration as the top priority.

... I think they [forums]are good enough. I'm not exactly sure what could be really better.

As a new manager a few seasons ago, I considered the forums so difficult to navigate and follow that they were essentially useless. I suspected there might be useful info there, but finding it the first time, and then even finding the thread again a few days later, proved almost impossible. With all due respect, that is not good enough for a new user. Forums that are useful to a new user should be a top priority.

The best threads grow rather long, and it becomes impossible to know where you are in the thread. …near the beginning? …near the end? …in the middle? Where was that really good post, I can’t find it. All you can do is go forward a few posts … a few more … a few more … a few more … oops, the end, it must have been the other way … go the other way a few posts … a few more … a few more … a few more … a few more … ah, I give up. It needs page numbers, maybe even post numbers. It needs a way to bookmark an especially good post to find it again.

The “Sneak Peek” is also inadequately organized. If a thread is not one of the few shown there with “Recent Activity,”, it is almost impossible to find, and much easier to ignore. That is not “good enough,” either. We need a way to place priority on a thread so it stays on top – that way we can follow the threads that are meaningful to us at our stage of development. For that matter, we need a way to place LOW priority on a thread, so we can push the silly wastes of time to the bottom.

If you think a top manager would throw aways 10-15million an hard bb income, it would be foolish.

No ne said give them MJ and kobe and shaq. I said give them good players to train not all capped players and bad potent players.. Not all useless. Let them have success and fun with a few good potent players is all.

I don't think it would be any thing of what your talking. if this case is the case look at utopia. Where is this chaos you speak of.? must be on 2 week break. Huh? Just because you would do that say a lot about how you think and your self.. I wouldn't becuase im sitting on 3.5 mill and a 16k arena. Not everyone is that low to do that.


And if they do then BB didn't something right for a change..



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 11/30/2014 7:44:31 PM