It all depends on what you want to do with them...as in what you are aiming to turn them into?
Despite their excellent potentials (2 x HOF, 1 x MVP) they aren't amazing trainees to be honest. Well, as a group of trainees anyway.
You are training 1v1 (Guards)...why? That will only really benefit the third trainee depending on what you plan to do with the first 2 bigs.
TRAINEE 1: Ichtiandras Gaidukevičius (Lietuva)
Weekly salary: $3,123
Role: Key Player
DMI: 28,000
Age: 18
Height: 6'8" / 203 cm
Potential: Hall of Famer
Game Shape: Respectable
Jump Shot: Competent
Range: Average
Outside Defense: Respectable
Handling: Competent ↑
Driving: Prominent
Passing: Respectable
Inside Shot: Strong
Inside Defense: Atrocious
Rebounding: Mediocre
Shot Blocking: Mediocre
Stamina: Inept
Free Throws: Competent
Experience: Atrocious
TSP: 69 (49 + 20)
Unless you are planning to put in a lot of hard seasons to turn this guy into an SF or PF, he is not good enough as a big if you are going to spend time training small skills now. At 6'8" the 1v1 (Guard) training won't give him many pops. Consider changing it to 1v1 (F0rwards SF/PF) so he is getting more IS training. The glaring hole is his ID and low rebounds at this stage. Yes, you can use the elastic effect to fix the ID, but when will you have time to spend a season or 2 on that as well as develop your 3rd guy (6'1" guard) who needs very different things?
I would really like to know what your plans for this guy is? If it's to make him a PF...fine...but he's going to need a lot of work on his bigs skills and you will need to use the elastic effect well to fix the holes.
EDIT: Grammar
Last edited by MrJ at 7/1/2025 1:21:38 AM
Home Grown; for teams who like a challenge!